File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Retrospective study of the 10-year clinical performance of direct resin composite restorations placed with the acid-etch technique.

TitleRetrospective study of the 10-year clinical performance of direct resin composite restorations placed with the acid-etch technique.
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date2007
Citation
Quintessence International (Berlin, Germany : 1985), 2007, v. 38 n. 5, p. e240-246 How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To assess the 10-year clinical performance of resin composite restorations placed using the acid-etch technique. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Clinical evaluation of 58 resin composite restorations was performed by 9 operators of the Operative Dentistry Clinic of the Dental Hospital, Tokyo Medical and Dental University. Conservative preparations had been made and a total-etch adhesive system used for the resin composite restorations, which were placed in 1992 in the Operative Dentistry Clinic. Restorations were scored using the following scale: Alfa--good; Bravo--clinically acceptable; Charlie--clinically unacceptable; Delta-already replaced. The scores were analyzed using the chi-square test and the expected cell frequency (P = .05). RESULTS: The 58 restorations from 26 patients (13 men and 13 women) were identified in the treatment records and analyzed. Twenty-two restorations (37.9%) presented Alfa scores and 17 restorations (29.3%) were clinically acceptable (Bravo scores), while 3 restorations (5.2%) received Charlie scores and 16 restorations (27.6%) had already been replaced (Delta scores). The descending ranking of longevity by restoration type was Class 5 >Class 3 >Class 2 >Class 1 >Class 4 (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Of the restorations evaluated, 67.2% were ser-viceable (combined Alfa and Bravo scores) 10 years after placement. Longevity was significantly influenced by cavity type.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90715
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.175
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.646
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNikaido, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorTakada, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorKitasako, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorOgata, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorShimada, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYoshikawa, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorNakajima, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorOtsuki, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:07:12Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:07:12Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_HK
dc.identifier.citationQuintessence International (Berlin, Germany : 1985), 2007, v. 38 n. 5, p. e240-246en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1936-7163en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90715-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To assess the 10-year clinical performance of resin composite restorations placed using the acid-etch technique. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Clinical evaluation of 58 resin composite restorations was performed by 9 operators of the Operative Dentistry Clinic of the Dental Hospital, Tokyo Medical and Dental University. Conservative preparations had been made and a total-etch adhesive system used for the resin composite restorations, which were placed in 1992 in the Operative Dentistry Clinic. Restorations were scored using the following scale: Alfa--good; Bravo--clinically acceptable; Charlie--clinically unacceptable; Delta-already replaced. The scores were analyzed using the chi-square test and the expected cell frequency (P = .05). RESULTS: The 58 restorations from 26 patients (13 men and 13 women) were identified in the treatment records and analyzed. Twenty-two restorations (37.9%) presented Alfa scores and 17 restorations (29.3%) were clinically acceptable (Bravo scores), while 3 restorations (5.2%) received Charlie scores and 16 restorations (27.6%) had already been replaced (Delta scores). The descending ranking of longevity by restoration type was Class 5 >Class 3 >Class 2 >Class 1 >Class 4 (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Of the restorations evaluated, 67.2% were ser-viceable (combined Alfa and Bravo scores) 10 years after placement. Longevity was significantly influenced by cavity type.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofQuintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)en_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAcid Etching, Dental - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshAcrylic Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshAdulten_HK
dc.subject.meshAgeden_HK
dc.subject.meshChi-Square Distributionen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration Failureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration, Permanent - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_HK
dc.subject.meshPolyurethanes - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysisen_HK
dc.titleRetrospective study of the 10-year clinical performance of direct resin composite restorations placed with the acid-etch technique.en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid17568828en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-34648817315en_HK
dc.identifier.volume38en_HK
dc.identifier.issue5en_HK
dc.identifier.spagee240en_HK
dc.identifier.epage246en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000246542300015-
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNikaido, T=7102059723en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTakada, T=7202752109en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKitasako, Y=7003435929en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridOgata, M=7201695408en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridShimada, Y=7402123770en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYoshikawa, T=7402717952en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNakajima, M=7402942991en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridOtsuki, M=7202018027en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl1936-7163-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats