File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparative study on treating complete dislocation of acromioclavicular joint with three different methods

TitleComparative study on treating complete dislocation of acromioclavicular joint with three different methods
Authors
KeywordsReferences (12) View In Table Layout
Issue Date2004
PublisherZhonghua Changshang Zazhi Bianjibu
Citation
Chinese Journal of Traumatology - English Edition, 2004, v. 7 n. 2, p. 101-107 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To comparatively study complete dislocation of acromioclavicular joint treated with three different methods. Methods: A total of 96 patients (81 males and 15 females, aged 16-59 years, mean = 45 years) with complete dislocation of acromioclavicular joint were treated with Dewar's operation (Group A, n = 32) , internal fixation with Kirschner tension band wires (Group B, n = 44), or internal fixation with Wolter plates (Group C, n = 20), respectively, in this study. Eighty-five patients suffered from acute dislocations and eleven from chronic dislocations. Results: The patients were followed up for 50 months on an average. According to Karlsson's standard, in Group A, 26 patients were assessed as good, 5 as fair and 1 as poor. In Group B, 20 patients were assessed as good, 13 as fair and 11 as poor. In Group C, 15 patients were assessed as good, 4 as fair and 1 as poor. The good and fair rates were significantly different between Group A and Group B, and between Group C and Group B, but no statistical difference was found between Group A and Group C. The operating time was (52.36 ± 7.24) minutes, (67.43 ± 8.11) minutes and (69.73 ± 8.04) minutes in Groups A, B and C, respectively. And the hospitalizing fees were (2 400 ± 270 yuan, (2 100 ± 190) yuan and (8 450 ± 360) yuan in Groups A, B and C, respectively. Conclusions: Dewar's operation is a good and safe method with shorter operating time and lower hospitalizing fee for treating complete dislocation of acromioclavicular joint. The method is simple without the need of a second operation to remove the implants and with few complications.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/91143
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.503
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, Ben_HK
dc.contributor.authorLian, K-Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorGuo, L-Xen_HK
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Z-Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorZhuang, Z-Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Q-Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Len_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:13:41Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:13:41Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_HK
dc.identifier.citationChinese Journal of Traumatology - English Edition, 2004, v. 7 n. 2, p. 101-107en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1008-1275en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/91143-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To comparatively study complete dislocation of acromioclavicular joint treated with three different methods. Methods: A total of 96 patients (81 males and 15 females, aged 16-59 years, mean = 45 years) with complete dislocation of acromioclavicular joint were treated with Dewar's operation (Group A, n = 32) , internal fixation with Kirschner tension band wires (Group B, n = 44), or internal fixation with Wolter plates (Group C, n = 20), respectively, in this study. Eighty-five patients suffered from acute dislocations and eleven from chronic dislocations. Results: The patients were followed up for 50 months on an average. According to Karlsson's standard, in Group A, 26 patients were assessed as good, 5 as fair and 1 as poor. In Group B, 20 patients were assessed as good, 13 as fair and 11 as poor. In Group C, 15 patients were assessed as good, 4 as fair and 1 as poor. The good and fair rates were significantly different between Group A and Group B, and between Group C and Group B, but no statistical difference was found between Group A and Group C. The operating time was (52.36 ± 7.24) minutes, (67.43 ± 8.11) minutes and (69.73 ± 8.04) minutes in Groups A, B and C, respectively. And the hospitalizing fees were (2 400 ± 270 yuan, (2 100 ± 190) yuan and (8 450 ± 360) yuan in Groups A, B and C, respectively. Conclusions: Dewar's operation is a good and safe method with shorter operating time and lower hospitalizing fee for treating complete dislocation of acromioclavicular joint. The method is simple without the need of a second operation to remove the implants and with few complications.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherZhonghua Changshang Zazhi Bianjibuen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofChinese Journal of Traumatology - English Editionen_HK
dc.subjectReferences (12) View In Table Layouten_HK
dc.titleComparative study on treating complete dislocation of acromioclavicular joint with three different methodsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLin, B:blin@hku.hken_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid15294129-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-1842687291en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-1842687291&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume7en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage101en_HK
dc.identifier.epage107en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl1008-1275-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats