File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.09.006
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-36348982127
- PMID: 17977062
- WOS: WOS:000252103400003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Evaluation of Epstein-Barr virus antigen-based immunoassays for serological diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Title | Evaluation of Epstein-Barr virus antigen-based immunoassays for serological diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Chinese Early antigen Epstein-Barr virus Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Virus capsid antigen |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcv |
Citation | Journal Of Clinical Virology, 2007, v. 40 n. 4, p. 284-288 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: Immunofluorescence (IF) assays based on Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded antigens have traditionally been the preferred approach for serological screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Objectives: To compare the performance of two new commercial assays (indicated by COMM) using, respectively, the IF and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) formats with an in-house IF assay (IFA). Study design: Sera from 163 patients with histologically confirmed NPC, and 98 healthy controls were tested with each of these assays and their results compared. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, respectively, for the COMM VCA IgA ELISA were 92.6%, 94.9%, 96.8%, 88.6%; for the COMM VCA IgA IFA were 96.9%, 41.8%, 73.5%, 89.1%; for the in-house VCA IgA IFA were 98.2%, 72.4%, 85.6%, 95.9%; for the COMM EA IgA ELISA were 46.6%, 100%, 100%, 53.0%; for the COMM EA IgA IFA were 77.3%, 100%, 100%, 72.6%; and for the in-house EA IgA IFA were 77.9%, 99.0%, 99.2%, 72.9%. Conclusions: The receiver operating characteristic curves comparison showed a marginal superior accuracy for the COMM VCA IgA ELISA, suggesting this to be used as a high-throughput serological screening assay, with the more specific COMM EA IgA IFA as a follow-up confirmatory assay in this NPC-endemic area. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/92061 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.344 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tang, JW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Rohwäder, E | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, IMT | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tsang, RKY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Steinhagen, K | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, ACM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | To, KF | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, PKS | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-17T10:34:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-17T10:34:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Clinical Virology, 2007, v. 40 n. 4, p. 284-288 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1386-6532 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/92061 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Immunofluorescence (IF) assays based on Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded antigens have traditionally been the preferred approach for serological screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Objectives: To compare the performance of two new commercial assays (indicated by COMM) using, respectively, the IF and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) formats with an in-house IF assay (IFA). Study design: Sera from 163 patients with histologically confirmed NPC, and 98 healthy controls were tested with each of these assays and their results compared. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, respectively, for the COMM VCA IgA ELISA were 92.6%, 94.9%, 96.8%, 88.6%; for the COMM VCA IgA IFA were 96.9%, 41.8%, 73.5%, 89.1%; for the in-house VCA IgA IFA were 98.2%, 72.4%, 85.6%, 95.9%; for the COMM EA IgA ELISA were 46.6%, 100%, 100%, 53.0%; for the COMM EA IgA IFA were 77.3%, 100%, 100%, 72.6%; and for the in-house EA IgA IFA were 77.9%, 99.0%, 99.2%, 72.9%. Conclusions: The receiver operating characteristic curves comparison showed a marginal superior accuracy for the COMM VCA IgA ELISA, suggesting this to be used as a high-throughput serological screening assay, with the more specific COMM EA IgA IFA as a follow-up confirmatory assay in this NPC-endemic area. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcv | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Virology | en_HK |
dc.subject | Chinese | en_HK |
dc.subject | Early antigen | en_HK |
dc.subject | Epstein-Barr virus | en_HK |
dc.subject | Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | en_HK |
dc.subject | Virus capsid antigen | en_HK |
dc.title | Evaluation of Epstein-Barr virus antigen-based immunoassays for serological diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Tsang, RKY: rkytsang@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Tsang, RKY=rp01386 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.09.006 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17977062 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-36348982127 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-36348982127&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 40 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 284 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 288 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000252103400003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Netherlands | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, JW=10341387300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Rohwäder, E=6504464796 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chu, IMT=7103327448 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tsang, RKY=7102940058 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Steinhagen, K=23010764600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yeung, ACM=21234619400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | To, KF=7101911940 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, PKS=32067487100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1386-6532 | - |