File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/ejo/cjl019
- WOS: WOS:000236435900015
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Cephalometric norms of Chinese: McNamara analysis
Title | Cephalometric norms of Chinese: McNamara analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Citation | The 81st Congress of European Orthodontic Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–7 June 2005. In European Journal of Orthodontics, 2006, v. 28 n. 2, p. e146 Abstract no.316 How to Cite? |
Abstract | AIM: To establish cephalometric norms in Chinese using McNamara’s (1984) analysis, and to
compare them with those of Caucasians.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken in natural head posture of a
random sample of 200 male and 205 female 12-year-old southern Chinese together with 43 male and
43 female 12-year-old British Caucasian children in Hong Kong. The radiographs were digitised
twice with the CASSOS program.
RESULTS: In males, the effective midface height, facial axis angle and pogonion to nasion
perpendicular were significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, while SNA, maxillomandibular
difference, mandibular plane angle, upper incisor to point A and lower incisor to A-Po line were
significantly larger in Chinese males than in Caucasian males. In females, the effective midface
height and facial axis angle were significantly larger in Caucasian than in Chinese, while the
maxillomandibular difference, lower anterior face height, mandibular plane angle, upper incisor to
point A and lower incisor to A-Po line were significantly larger in Chinese females than in Caucasian
females.
CONCLUSION: There are significant differences between Caucasian and Chinese cephalometric
norms using McNamara’s analysis. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/94666 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.940 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wu, J | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hagg, EUO | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Rabie, ABM | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-25T15:38:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-25T15:38:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | The 81st Congress of European Orthodontic Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–7 June 2005. In European Journal of Orthodontics, 2006, v. 28 n. 2, p. e146 Abstract no.316 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0141-5387 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/94666 | - |
dc.description.abstract | AIM: To establish cephalometric norms in Chinese using McNamara’s (1984) analysis, and to compare them with those of Caucasians. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken in natural head posture of a random sample of 200 male and 205 female 12-year-old southern Chinese together with 43 male and 43 female 12-year-old British Caucasian children in Hong Kong. The radiographs were digitised twice with the CASSOS program. RESULTS: In males, the effective midface height, facial axis angle and pogonion to nasion perpendicular were significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, while SNA, maxillomandibular difference, mandibular plane angle, upper incisor to point A and lower incisor to A-Po line were significantly larger in Chinese males than in Caucasian males. In females, the effective midface height and facial axis angle were significantly larger in Caucasian than in Chinese, while the maxillomandibular difference, lower anterior face height, mandibular plane angle, upper incisor to point A and lower incisor to A-Po line were significantly larger in Chinese females than in Caucasian females. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences between Caucasian and Chinese cephalometric norms using McNamara’s analysis. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Orthodontics | en_HK |
dc.title | Cephalometric norms of Chinese: McNamara analysis | en_HK |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Hagg, EUO: euohagg@hkusua.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Rabie, ABM: rabie@hkusua.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Hagg, EUO=rp00020 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Rabie, ABM=rp00029 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/ejo/cjl019 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 110905 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 115 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000236435900015 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0141-5387 | - |