File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Cephalometric norms of Chinese: Pancherz analysis

TitleCephalometric norms of Chinese: Pancherz analysis
Authors
Issue Date2006
PublisherOxford University Press
Citation
The 81st Congress of European Orthodontic Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–7 June 2005. In The European Journal of Orthodontics, 2006, v. 28 n. 2, p. e145-e146 Abstract no.315 How to Cite?
AbstractAIM: To establish cephalometric norms for Chinese using the analysis of Pancherz (1982), and to compare them with those of Caucasians. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken in natural head posture of a random sample of 200 male and 205 female 12-year-old southern Chinese together with 43 male and 43 female 12-year-old British Caucasian children in Hong Kong. The radiographs were digitised twice using the CASSOS program. RESULTS: In males with Pancherz’s sagittal analysis, the position of the maxillary base, mandibular base, mandibular length and molar relationship were significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, while the maxillary central incisor related to point A and mandibular central incisor related to pogonion were significantly larger in Chinese than in Caucasians. In males with Pancherz’s vertical analysis, the overbite was significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese while the position of the mandibular central incisor, maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars, nasal plane angle, mandibular plane angle and mandibular occlusal plane angle were significantly larger in Chinese than in Caucasians. For females using Pancherz’s sagittal analysis, the position of the maxillary and mandibular base, maxillary permanent first molar, mandibular length, overjet, jaw relationship and molar relationship were significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, but the maxillary central incisor related to point A and the mandibular central incisor relate to pogonion were significantly larger in Chinese than in Caucasians. In females using Pancherz’s vertical analysis, overbite was significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, but lower face height, the position of the mandibular central incisor, the maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars, nasal plane angle and mandibular plane angle were significantly larger in Chinese than in Caucasians. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences between Chinese and Caucasian using Pancherz’s analysis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/94891
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.131
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.252
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorHagg, EUOen_HK
dc.contributor.authorRabie, ABMen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-25T15:45:03Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-25T15:45:03Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_HK
dc.identifier.citationThe 81st Congress of European Orthodontic Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–7 June 2005. In The European Journal of Orthodontics, 2006, v. 28 n. 2, p. e145-e146 Abstract no.315en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/94891-
dc.description.abstractAIM: To establish cephalometric norms for Chinese using the analysis of Pancherz (1982), and to compare them with those of Caucasians. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken in natural head posture of a random sample of 200 male and 205 female 12-year-old southern Chinese together with 43 male and 43 female 12-year-old British Caucasian children in Hong Kong. The radiographs were digitised twice using the CASSOS program. RESULTS: In males with Pancherz’s sagittal analysis, the position of the maxillary base, mandibular base, mandibular length and molar relationship were significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, while the maxillary central incisor related to point A and mandibular central incisor related to pogonion were significantly larger in Chinese than in Caucasians. In males with Pancherz’s vertical analysis, the overbite was significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese while the position of the mandibular central incisor, maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars, nasal plane angle, mandibular plane angle and mandibular occlusal plane angle were significantly larger in Chinese than in Caucasians. For females using Pancherz’s sagittal analysis, the position of the maxillary and mandibular base, maxillary permanent first molar, mandibular length, overjet, jaw relationship and molar relationship were significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, but the maxillary central incisor related to point A and the mandibular central incisor relate to pogonion were significantly larger in Chinese than in Caucasians. In females using Pancherz’s vertical analysis, overbite was significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, but lower face height, the position of the mandibular central incisor, the maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars, nasal plane angle and mandibular plane angle were significantly larger in Chinese than in Caucasians. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences between Chinese and Caucasian using Pancherz’s analysis.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofThe European Journal of Orthodonticsen_HK
dc.titleCephalometric norms of Chinese: Pancherz analysisen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailHagg, EUO: euohagg@hkusua.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailRabie, ABM: rabie@hkusua.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityHagg, EUO=rp00020en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityRabie, ABM=rp00029en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjl019-
dc.identifier.hkuros110902en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000236435900015-
dc.identifier.issnl0141-5387-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats