File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Reinvention or hollowing-out? The dilemma of production restructuring of the Hong Kong film industry through cross-border co-production with China film companies

TitleReinvention or hollowing-out? The dilemma of production restructuring of the Hong Kong film industry through cross-border co-production with China film companies
Authors
KeywordsCulture and creative industry
Hong Kong film industry
Production restructuring
Cross-border economy
Issue Date2010
Citation
The 2010 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographer (AAG), Washington, DC., 14-18 April 2010. How to Cite?
AbstractIn the early 1990s, the Hong Kong film industry reached its peak, producing over 200 feature films per year with over 15,000 employees taking up 79% of the gross local film market. The figure was drastically reduced to 25% in 2008. With the increasing penetration of Hollywood and Asian cinemas in the local and regional markets, the heyday of small-and-medium budget Hong Kong films have been replaced by a bifurcated production organization. Medium budget films disappear. Small budget productions targeting local and Southeast Asian markets are struggling to survive, while extremely large budget films co-produced with Chinese film companies targeting the China market have become more dominant recently. The bifurcation has exacerbated the 'winner-take-all' phenomenon in the Hong Kong film industry. We found that Hong Kong cross-border co-production is not merely a minor expense in run-away locational shooting, as it is for Hollywood, which maintains a majority of pre-and-post production expenses in Los Angeles. The Hong Kong film restructuring story is more like a gradual hollowing-out phenomenon that results in the shrinking of the local labor market and the tarnished dream of upward mobility for young film graduates. The non-interventionist Hong Kong government did little to revive Hong Kong film, causing it to further lose market share to other Asian films (Korea, Taiwan, Thailand), which have strong backup from developmental states aggressively promoting film as their major 'culture and creative industry.
DescriptionPaper Session - China and Globalization II: Industry
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/124339

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, YCen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSzeto, MMen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-31T10:28:58Z-
dc.date.available2010-10-31T10:28:58Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationThe 2010 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographer (AAG), Washington, DC., 14-18 April 2010.en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/124339-
dc.descriptionPaper Session - China and Globalization II: Industry-
dc.description.abstractIn the early 1990s, the Hong Kong film industry reached its peak, producing over 200 feature films per year with over 15,000 employees taking up 79% of the gross local film market. The figure was drastically reduced to 25% in 2008. With the increasing penetration of Hollywood and Asian cinemas in the local and regional markets, the heyday of small-and-medium budget Hong Kong films have been replaced by a bifurcated production organization. Medium budget films disappear. Small budget productions targeting local and Southeast Asian markets are struggling to survive, while extremely large budget films co-produced with Chinese film companies targeting the China market have become more dominant recently. The bifurcation has exacerbated the 'winner-take-all' phenomenon in the Hong Kong film industry. We found that Hong Kong cross-border co-production is not merely a minor expense in run-away locational shooting, as it is for Hollywood, which maintains a majority of pre-and-post production expenses in Los Angeles. The Hong Kong film restructuring story is more like a gradual hollowing-out phenomenon that results in the shrinking of the local labor market and the tarnished dream of upward mobility for young film graduates. The non-interventionist Hong Kong government did little to revive Hong Kong film, causing it to further lose market share to other Asian films (Korea, Taiwan, Thailand), which have strong backup from developmental states aggressively promoting film as their major 'culture and creative industry.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Meeting of the Association of American Geographer, AAG 2010-
dc.subjectCulture and creative industry-
dc.subjectHong Kong film industry-
dc.subjectProduction restructuring-
dc.subjectCross-border economy-
dc.titleReinvention or hollowing-out? The dilemma of production restructuring of the Hong Kong film industry through cross-border co-production with China film companiesen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailSzeto, MM: mmszeto@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros179982en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats