File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Experimental comparison of traditional and alternating winding method for planar spiral inductor

TitleExperimental comparison of traditional and alternating winding method for planar spiral inductor
Authors
Lee, CKHui, SYR
Issue Date2010
PublisherThe Institution of Engineering and Technology. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ieedl.org/EL
Citation
Electronics Letters, 2010, v. 46 n. 3, p. 238-239 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el.2010.2760
AbstractTwo planar winding structures have been built to compare the characteristics of traditional and alternating winding methods. The alternating winding method reduces the potential difference of adjacent conductors, thus reducing substantially the self-capacitance in the winding. Measurements confirmed that the two inductors have similar equivalent inductance and low-frequency series resistance. However, the alternating winding method has a higher self resonant frequency. It is also evident that the reduction of self-capacitance in the winding not only increased the operating bandwidth of the device but also reduced the power losses of the inductor at high frequency. © 2010 The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/155556
ISSN
0013-5194
2023 Impact Factor: 0.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.323
ISI Accession Number ID
WOS:000274631000034
References
References in Scopus

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, CKen_US
dc.contributor.authorHui, SYRen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:34:05Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:34:05Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.citationElectronics Letters, 2010, v. 46 n. 3, p. 238-239en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-5194en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/155556-
dc.description.abstractTwo planar winding structures have been built to compare the characteristics of traditional and alternating winding methods. The alternating winding method reduces the potential difference of adjacent conductors, thus reducing substantially the self-capacitance in the winding. Measurements confirmed that the two inductors have similar equivalent inductance and low-frequency series resistance. However, the alternating winding method has a higher self resonant frequency. It is also evident that the reduction of self-capacitance in the winding not only increased the operating bandwidth of the device but also reduced the power losses of the inductor at high frequency. © 2010 The Institution of Engineering and Technology.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherThe Institution of Engineering and Technology. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ieedl.org/ELen_US
dc.relation.ispartofElectronics Lettersen_US
dc.titleExperimental comparison of traditional and alternating winding method for planar spiral inductoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailHui, SYR:ronhui@eee.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityHui, SYR=rp01510en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1049/el.2010.2760en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-76249124336en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-76249124336&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume46en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage238en_US
dc.identifier.epage239en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000274631000034-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLee, CK=24468281700en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHui, SYR=7202831744en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0013-5194-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats