How sonoporation disrupts cellular structural integrity: morphological and cytoskeletal observations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In considering sonoporation for drug delivery applications, it is essential to understand how living cells respond to this puncturing force. Here we seek to investigate the effects of sonoporation on cellular structural integrity. We hypothesize that the membrane morphology and cytoskeletal behavior of sonoporated cells under recovery would inherently differ from that of normal viable cells. METHODS: A customized and calibrated exposure platform was developed for this work, and the ZR-75-30 breast carcinoma cells were used as the cell model. The cells were exposed to either single or multiple pulses of 1 MHz ultrasound (pulse length: 30 or 100 cycles; PRF: 1kHz; duration: up to 60s) with 0.45 MPa spatial-averaged peak negative pressure and in the presence of lipid-shelled microbubbles. Confocal microscopy was used to examine insitu the structural integrity of sonoporated cells (identified as ones with exogenous fluorescent marker internalization). For investigations on membrane morphology, FM 4-64 was used as the membrane dye (red), and calcein was used as the sonoporation marker (green); for studies on cytoskeletal behavior, CellLight (green) and propidium iodide (red) were used to respectively label actin filaments and sonoporated cells. Observation started from before exposure to up to 2 h after exposure, and confocal images were acquired at real-time frame rates. Cellular structural features and their temporal kinetics were quantitatively analyzed to assess the consistency of trends amongst a group of cells. RESULTS: Sonoporated cells exhibited membrane shrinkage (decreased by 61% in a cell’s cross-sectional area) and intracellular lipid accumulation (381% increase compared to control) over a 2 h period. The morphological repression of sonoporated cells was also found to correspond with post-sonoporation cytoskeletal processes: actin depolymerization was observed as soon as pores were induced on the membrane. These results show that cellular structural integrity is indeed disrupted over the course of sonoporation. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation shows that the biophysical impact of sonoporation is by no means limited to the induction of membrane pores: e.g. structural integrity is concomitantly affected in the process. This prompts the need for further fundamental studies to unravel the complex sequence of biological events involved in sonoporation.