File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Focus group study to explore critical factors of public engagement process for mega development projects

TitleFocus group study to explore critical factors of public engagement process for mega development projects
Authors
KeywordsFocus group
Logical decision-making process
Organizational issues
Public engagement
Team behaviors
Issue Date2014
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pubs.asce.org/journals/co.html
Citation
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2014, v. 140 n. 3, article no. 04013061 How to Cite?
AbstractDue to the dynamic nature of construction projects, multiple stakeholders with various expectations are often involved. To achieve consensus among different stakeholders, public engagement (PE) is increasingly adopted for mega development projects. However, it is really difficult to satisfy various stakeholder needs if PE is inappropriately conducted. PE has been criticized for its illogical and unsystematic processes underlying decisions. Hence, the current study aimed to explore and identify critical factors of the PE process in order to improve final performance. To achieve this aim, four focus groups were held involving different types of stakeholders (e.g., governmental departments, construction professionals, interest groups, and local residents). PE process factors, addressed in the focus groups, fell into two main categories: logical decision-making process and team behaviors, with the latter divided into task and personal dimensions. The results of the current study were used as the first stage of a comprehensive study aimed at improving PE performance. Several practical recommendations for facilitating the PE process were also pointed out in the group discussion, such as the application of logical and systematic decision-making processes, the establishment of effective evaluation methods and frameworks for evaluation criteria, and the usage of transparent and equal discussion rules.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200837
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.292
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.967
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, MYen_US
dc.contributor.authorYu, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, IYSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-21T07:03:53Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-21T07:03:53Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2014, v. 140 n. 3, article no. 04013061en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-9364en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/200837-
dc.description.abstractDue to the dynamic nature of construction projects, multiple stakeholders with various expectations are often involved. To achieve consensus among different stakeholders, public engagement (PE) is increasingly adopted for mega development projects. However, it is really difficult to satisfy various stakeholder needs if PE is inappropriately conducted. PE has been criticized for its illogical and unsystematic processes underlying decisions. Hence, the current study aimed to explore and identify critical factors of the PE process in order to improve final performance. To achieve this aim, four focus groups were held involving different types of stakeholders (e.g., governmental departments, construction professionals, interest groups, and local residents). PE process factors, addressed in the focus groups, fell into two main categories: logical decision-making process and team behaviors, with the latter divided into task and personal dimensions. The results of the current study were used as the first stage of a comprehensive study aimed at improving PE performance. Several practical recommendations for facilitating the PE process were also pointed out in the group discussion, such as the application of logical and systematic decision-making processes, the establishment of effective evaluation methods and frameworks for evaluation criteria, and the usage of transparent and equal discussion rules.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pubs.asce.org/journals/co.htmlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Construction Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.rightsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management. Copyright © American Society of Civil Engineers.en_US
dc.subjectFocus group-
dc.subjectLogical decision-making process-
dc.subjectOrganizational issues-
dc.subjectPublic engagement-
dc.subjectTeam behaviors-
dc.titleFocus group study to explore critical factors of public engagement process for mega development projectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailChan, IYS: iyschan@hku.hken_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000815en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84894423946-
dc.identifier.hkuros232213en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros254548-
dc.identifier.volume140en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage04013061-1en_US
dc.identifier.epage04013061-11en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000332659900011-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.issnl0733-9364-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats