File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00417-014-2889-7
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84925493743
- WOS: WOS:000349004600001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The Role of Electrical Stimulation Therapy in Ophthalmic Diseases
Title | The Role of Electrical Stimulation Therapy in Ophthalmic Diseases |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Electrical stimulation therapy Neuroprotection Ophthalmic diseases Photoreceptor Retinal ganglion cell |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Citation | Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2015, v. 253 n. 2, p. 171-176 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Introduction: Electrical stimulation therapy (EST) involves the use of low-intensity electrical current in treatment of neuromuscular conditions. In the recent two decades, EST has emerged as a potential neuro-protective strategy in certain ophthalmic diseases, aided by a lack of effective management for these conditions. Purpose: The aim of this review is to summarize and discuss current available evidence for the use of EST in ophthalmic diseases in the laboratory setting and in human trials. Methods: The compilation and review of published English-language reports on the use of EST in human ophthalmic disease and animal models of ophthalmic disease. . Results: From published reports, research work on the use of EST in ophthalmic diseases began in the last twenty years. Different methods of electrical stimulation have been devised, with varying levels of invasiveness. Results from human trials have favored earlier and repeated treatment after insults to the optic nerve, while EST has shown transient effectiveness in degenerative diseases of photoreceptors. Patients also reported no serious adverse effects from EST in the clinical trials. Results from animal studies have further confirmed survival benefits of EST in retinal cell survival, with the underlying mechanism likely multifactorial, but involving Müller cell modulation. Conclusions: Results from human and animal studies have demonstrated the relevance and potential effectiveness of EST in ophthalmic disease. However, optimal disease and species-specific stimulation settings need to be defined. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/207463 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.014 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | FU, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lo, ACY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, JSM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Shih, KC | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-19T13:22:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-19T13:22:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2015, v. 253 n. 2, p. 171-176 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0721-832X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/207463 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Electrical stimulation therapy (EST) involves the use of low-intensity electrical current in treatment of neuromuscular conditions. In the recent two decades, EST has emerged as a potential neuro-protective strategy in certain ophthalmic diseases, aided by a lack of effective management for these conditions. Purpose: The aim of this review is to summarize and discuss current available evidence for the use of EST in ophthalmic diseases in the laboratory setting and in human trials. Methods: The compilation and review of published English-language reports on the use of EST in human ophthalmic disease and animal models of ophthalmic disease. . Results: From published reports, research work on the use of EST in ophthalmic diseases began in the last twenty years. Different methods of electrical stimulation have been devised, with varying levels of invasiveness. Results from human trials have favored earlier and repeated treatment after insults to the optic nerve, while EST has shown transient effectiveness in degenerative diseases of photoreceptors. Patients also reported no serious adverse effects from EST in the clinical trials. Results from animal studies have further confirmed survival benefits of EST in retinal cell survival, with the underlying mechanism likely multifactorial, but involving Müller cell modulation. Conclusions: Results from human and animal studies have demonstrated the relevance and potential effectiveness of EST in ophthalmic disease. However, optimal disease and species-specific stimulation settings need to be defined. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | en_US |
dc.subject | Electrical stimulation therapy | - |
dc.subject | Neuroprotection | - |
dc.subject | Ophthalmic diseases | - |
dc.subject | Photoreceptor | - |
dc.subject | Retinal ganglion cell | - |
dc.title | The Role of Electrical Stimulation Therapy in Ophthalmic Diseases | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lo, ACY: amylo@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lai, JSM: laism@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Shih, KC: kcshih@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lo, ACY=rp00425 | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lai, JSM=rp00295 | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Shih, KC=rp01374 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00417-014-2889-7 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84925493743 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 241718 | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1435-702X | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000349004600001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0721-832X | - |