File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00222.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-18844422973
- WOS: WOS:000227063000001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Property-led redevelopment in post-reform China: A case study of Xintiandi redevelopment project in Shanghai
Title | Property-led redevelopment in post-reform China: A case study of Xintiandi redevelopment project in Shanghai |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2005 |
Citation | Journal of Urban Affairs, 2005, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1-23 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Urban redevelopment in China has experienced great transformation. Government-backed redevelopment has been replaced by privately funded and property-led redevelopment. This article discerns the impetus of ongoing property-led redevelopment. A case study of the Xintiandi project in Shanghai reveals how property-led redevelopment actually works. Pro-growth coalitions between local government and developers are formed. Despite its role as capital provider, the private, sector is still regulated by the government due to its negligible influence on local governance. The government controls the direction and pace of urban redevelopment through policy intervention, financial leverages, and governance of land leasing. Property-led redevelopment is driven by diverse motivations of different levels of the government, e.g. transforming urban land use functions, showing off the entrepreneurial capability of local government, and maximizing negotiated land benefits. Driven by profit seeking, some thriving urban neighborhoods are displaced by high-value property development, and suffer from uneven redevelopment. Copyright © 2005 Urban Affairs Association All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/207503 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.775 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | He, Shenjing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Fulong | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-31T01:01:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-31T01:01:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Urban Affairs, 2005, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1-23 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0735-2166 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/207503 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Urban redevelopment in China has experienced great transformation. Government-backed redevelopment has been replaced by privately funded and property-led redevelopment. This article discerns the impetus of ongoing property-led redevelopment. A case study of the Xintiandi project in Shanghai reveals how property-led redevelopment actually works. Pro-growth coalitions between local government and developers are formed. Despite its role as capital provider, the private, sector is still regulated by the government due to its negligible influence on local governance. The government controls the direction and pace of urban redevelopment through policy intervention, financial leverages, and governance of land leasing. Property-led redevelopment is driven by diverse motivations of different levels of the government, e.g. transforming urban land use functions, showing off the entrepreneurial capability of local government, and maximizing negotiated land benefits. Driven by profit seeking, some thriving urban neighborhoods are displaced by high-value property development, and suffer from uneven redevelopment. Copyright © 2005 Urban Affairs Association All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Urban Affairs | - |
dc.title | Property-led redevelopment in post-reform China: A case study of Xintiandi redevelopment project in Shanghai | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00222.x | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-18844422973 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 23 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000227063000001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0735-2166 | - |