File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Rights to consume bunkers before payment: neither as a bailee nor as an owner
| Title | Rights to consume bunkers before payment: neither as a bailee nor as an owner |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Action for price Bailment Bunkers Contracts of sale Ownership |
| Issue Date | 2017 |
| Publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=423&productid=6944 |
| Citation | International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2017, v. 28 n. 3, p. 104-106 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | In PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC and another v O W Bunker Malta Limited and another [2016] UKSC 23, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine whether the contract for the supply of bunkers was a contract of sale of goods between the bunker supplier and the shipowners under s. 2 of the Sale of Goods Act. Despite all the hallmarks of being a contract of sale of goods, the Supreme Court concluded that the agreement was not a contract of sale of goods. The implications behind the reasoning of the decision are examined. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/240358 |
| ISSN |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chan, FWH | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-19T08:23:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-04-19T08:23:23Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2017, v. 28 n. 3, p. 104-106 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0958-5214 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/240358 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC and another v O W Bunker Malta Limited and another [2016] UKSC 23, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine whether the contract for the supply of bunkers was a contract of sale of goods between the bunker supplier and the shipowners under s. 2 of the Sale of Goods Act. Despite all the hallmarks of being a contract of sale of goods, the Supreme Court concluded that the agreement was not a contract of sale of goods. The implications behind the reasoning of the decision are examined. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=423&productid=6944 | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Company and Commercial Law Review | - |
| dc.subject | Action for price | - |
| dc.subject | Bailment | - |
| dc.subject | Bunkers | - |
| dc.subject | Contracts of sale | - |
| dc.subject | Ownership | - |
| dc.title | Rights to consume bunkers before payment: neither as a bailee nor as an owner | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.email | Chan, FWH: fwhchan@hku.hk | - |
| dc.identifier.authority | Chan, FWH=rp01280 | - |
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 271735 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 28 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 104 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 106 | - |
| dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0958-5214 | - |