File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Rights to consume bunkers before payment: neither as a bailee nor as an owner

TitleRights to consume bunkers before payment: neither as a bailee nor as an owner
Authors
KeywordsAction for price
Bailment
Bunkers
Contracts of sale
Ownership
Issue Date2017
PublisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=423&productid=6944
Citation
International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2017, v. 28 n. 3, p. 104-106 How to Cite?
AbstractIn PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC and another v O W Bunker Malta Limited and another [2016] UKSC 23, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine whether the contract for the supply of bunkers was a contract of sale of goods between the bunker supplier and the shipowners under s. 2 of the Sale of Goods Act. Despite all the hallmarks of being a contract of sale of goods, the Supreme Court concluded that the agreement was not a contract of sale of goods. The implications behind the reasoning of the decision are examined.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/240358
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, FWH-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-19T08:23:23Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-19T08:23:23Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Company and Commercial Law Review, 2017, v. 28 n. 3, p. 104-106-
dc.identifier.issn0958-5214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/240358-
dc.description.abstractIn PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC and another v O W Bunker Malta Limited and another [2016] UKSC 23, the Supreme Court was called upon to determine whether the contract for the supply of bunkers was a contract of sale of goods between the bunker supplier and the shipowners under s. 2 of the Sale of Goods Act. Despite all the hallmarks of being a contract of sale of goods, the Supreme Court concluded that the agreement was not a contract of sale of goods. The implications behind the reasoning of the decision are examined.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=423&productid=6944-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Company and Commercial Law Review-
dc.subjectAction for price-
dc.subjectBailment-
dc.subjectBunkers-
dc.subjectContracts of sale-
dc.subjectOwnership-
dc.titleRights to consume bunkers before payment: neither as a bailee nor as an owner-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, FWH: fwhchan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, FWH=rp01280-
dc.identifier.hkuros271735-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage104-
dc.identifier.epage106-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats