File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/ojls/gqx006
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85031802185
- WOS: WOS:000412809200005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Loss-Based Retributive Justifications of Punishment
| Title | Loss-Based Retributive Justifications of Punishment |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Jurisprudence Legal philosophy Punishment Retribution |
| Issue Date | 2017 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://ojls.oxfordjournals.org/ |
| Citation | Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, v. 37, p. 618-635 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Retributive justifications of punishment that focus on the gain of offenders, like those offered by Herbert Morris and Jeffrie Murphy, have been subjected to sustained and persuasive criticism. Three authors (Daniel McDermott, Richard Lippke and Göran Duus-Otterström) have, in their fairly recent works, offered retributive justifications of punishment that focus instead on the loss suffered by victims. I will argue that these loss-based justifications, despite their ingenuity, suffer from serious defects. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/249637 |
| ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 1.443 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.497 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chau, SC | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-21T03:04:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-11-21T03:04:57Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, v. 37, p. 618-635 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0143-6503 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/249637 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Retributive justifications of punishment that focus on the gain of offenders, like those offered by Herbert Morris and Jeffrie Murphy, have been subjected to sustained and persuasive criticism. Three authors (Daniel McDermott, Richard Lippke and Göran Duus-Otterström) have, in their fairly recent works, offered retributive justifications of punishment that focus instead on the loss suffered by victims. I will argue that these loss-based justifications, despite their ingenuity, suffer from serious defects. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://ojls.oxfordjournals.org/ | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Oxford Journal of Legal Studies | - |
| dc.rights | Pre-print: Journal Title] ©: [year] [owner as specified on the article] Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of xxxxxx]. All rights reserved. Pre-print (Once an article is published, preprint notice should be amended to): This is an electronic version of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final version of the Article as published in the print edition of the Journal.] Post-print: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: xxxxxxx [insert URL that the author will receive upon publication here]. | - |
| dc.subject | Jurisprudence | - |
| dc.subject | Legal philosophy | - |
| dc.subject | Punishment | - |
| dc.subject | Retribution | - |
| dc.title | Loss-Based Retributive Justifications of Punishment | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.email | Chau, SC: pscchau@hku.hk | - |
| dc.identifier.authority | Chau, SC=rp01529 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/ojls/gqx006 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85031802185 | - |
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 282589 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 37 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 618 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 635 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1464-3820 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000412809200005 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0143-6503 | - |