File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Role of second high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for unsatisfactory benign thyroid nodules after first treatment

TitleRole of second high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for unsatisfactory benign thyroid nodules after first treatment
Authors
KeywordsAblation techniques
High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation
Interventional ultrasonography
Treatment efficacy
Ultrasound imaging
Issue Date2018
PublisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00330/index.htm
Citation
European Radiology, 2018 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of second high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation treatment in benign thyroid nodules that had failed to shrink by > 50% 6 months after the first treatment. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who did not achieve 50% volume reduction at 6 months after the first HIFU treatment underwent a second HIFU treatment. Nodule volume was measured on ultrasound at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Extent of nodule shrinkage (by volume reduction ratio) (VRR) = [Baseline volume - volume at 6 months]/[Baseline volume] * 100. Treatment success was defined as VRR > 50%. Obstructive symptom score (by 0-10 visual analogue scale, VAS) was evaluated for 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: No complications occurred after the second treatment. The mean 6-month VRR was 21.78 ± 16.87% with a median (range) of 16.16 (1.63-54.07)%. At 6 months, only two (7.1%) patients achieved treatment success, while nine (32.1%) patients had VRR < 10%. However, relative to baseline (3.96 ± 1.04), the mean VAS significantly improved at 3 and 6 months (2.96 ± 1.43, p<0.001 and 2.58 ± 1.39, p<0.001, respectively). There was a significant correlation between VRR and improvement in VAS score at 6 months (ρ=0.438, p=0.025). Greater nodule volume before the second treatment (OR=1.169, 95% CI=1.004-1.361, p=0.045) was a significant factor for greater VRR after the second treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although subjective obstructive symptoms continued to improve after the second treatment, the actual extent of nodule shrinkage was small. Larger-volume nodules tended to shrink more significantly than smaller-volume nodules in the second treatment. KEY POINTS: • Second treatment resulted in small shrinkage in unsatisfactory nodules after first treatment. • Obstructive symptoms tended to continue to improve after second treatment. • Larger-size nodules tended to respond better in the second treatment.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/259237
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 7.034
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.606
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLang, HHB-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, YC-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, WHK-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-03T04:03:41Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-03T04:03:41Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Radiology, 2018-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/259237-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of second high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation treatment in benign thyroid nodules that had failed to shrink by > 50% 6 months after the first treatment. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who did not achieve 50% volume reduction at 6 months after the first HIFU treatment underwent a second HIFU treatment. Nodule volume was measured on ultrasound at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Extent of nodule shrinkage (by volume reduction ratio) (VRR) = [Baseline volume - volume at 6 months]/[Baseline volume] * 100. Treatment success was defined as VRR > 50%. Obstructive symptom score (by 0-10 visual analogue scale, VAS) was evaluated for 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: No complications occurred after the second treatment. The mean 6-month VRR was 21.78 ± 16.87% with a median (range) of 16.16 (1.63-54.07)%. At 6 months, only two (7.1%) patients achieved treatment success, while nine (32.1%) patients had VRR < 10%. However, relative to baseline (3.96 ± 1.04), the mean VAS significantly improved at 3 and 6 months (2.96 ± 1.43, p<0.001 and 2.58 ± 1.39, p<0.001, respectively). There was a significant correlation between VRR and improvement in VAS score at 6 months (ρ=0.438, p=0.025). Greater nodule volume before the second treatment (OR=1.169, 95% CI=1.004-1.361, p=0.045) was a significant factor for greater VRR after the second treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although subjective obstructive symptoms continued to improve after the second treatment, the actual extent of nodule shrinkage was small. Larger-volume nodules tended to shrink more significantly than smaller-volume nodules in the second treatment. KEY POINTS: • Second treatment resulted in small shrinkage in unsatisfactory nodules after first treatment. • Obstructive symptoms tended to continue to improve after second treatment. • Larger-size nodules tended to respond better in the second treatment.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00330/index.htm-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Radiology-
dc.rightsThe final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]-
dc.subjectAblation techniques-
dc.subjectHigh-intensity focused ultrasound ablation-
dc.subjectInterventional ultrasonography-
dc.subjectTreatment efficacy-
dc.subjectUltrasound imaging-
dc.titleRole of second high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for unsatisfactory benign thyroid nodules after first treatment-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLang, HHB: Blang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWoo, YC: wooyucho@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChiu, WHK: kwhchiu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLang, HHB=rp01828-
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, WHK=rp02074-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-018-5671-0-
dc.identifier.pmid30088067-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85051865769-
dc.identifier.hkuros289588-
dc.identifier.volumeepub ahead of print-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000457396100044-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-
dc.identifier.issnl0938-7994-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats