File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Causal relationship between religiosity and value priorities: Cross-sectional and longitudinal investigations

TitleCausal relationship between religiosity and value priorities: Cross-sectional and longitudinal investigations
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/rel/index.aspx
Citation
Psychology of Religion & Spirituality, 2020, v. 12 n. 1, p. 77-87 How to Cite?
AbstractReligiosity and values are correlated. However, it is unclear whether it is because certain values predispose one to becoming and staying religious or whether religious persons are more likely to adopt those values. To clarify this ambiguity in directionality, we collected cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a Chinese sample (N = 3,248). We replicated previous findings that Christians and nonbelievers differ on all 10 values in Schwartz’s model. Longitudinal analyses further showed that religious affiliation predicted increase in tradition and decline in self-direction, hedonism, and security about three years later. Making finer distinction within the Christian subsample, we showed that vertical faith maturity (relationship with the transcendence) was associated with all values except security, whereas horizontal faith maturity (charity toward fellow human beings) was associated with 7 values. Furthermore, longitudinal analyses revealed that vertical and horizontal faith maturity predicted 2-year changes in some values and in different directions: Vertical faith maturity predicted higher security and lower self-direction around two years later; horizontal faith maturity predicted higher self-direction and lower security around two years later. Evidence of relationship also goes in the opposite direction: Benevolence predicted positive changes in both vertical and horizontal faith maturity. Future assertions on the predictions of directional relationships between religiosity and values should specify the particular value and religiosity dimension.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/261324
ISSN
2017 Impact Factor: 1.662
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.059

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, WYS-
dc.contributor.authorLau, WWF-
dc.contributor.authorHui, HCC-
dc.contributor.authorLau, EYY-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, SF-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-14T08:56:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-14T08:56:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationPsychology of Religion & Spirituality, 2020, v. 12 n. 1, p. 77-87-
dc.identifier.issn1941-1022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/261324-
dc.description.abstractReligiosity and values are correlated. However, it is unclear whether it is because certain values predispose one to becoming and staying religious or whether religious persons are more likely to adopt those values. To clarify this ambiguity in directionality, we collected cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a Chinese sample (N = 3,248). We replicated previous findings that Christians and nonbelievers differ on all 10 values in Schwartz’s model. Longitudinal analyses further showed that religious affiliation predicted increase in tradition and decline in self-direction, hedonism, and security about three years later. Making finer distinction within the Christian subsample, we showed that vertical faith maturity (relationship with the transcendence) was associated with all values except security, whereas horizontal faith maturity (charity toward fellow human beings) was associated with 7 values. Furthermore, longitudinal analyses revealed that vertical and horizontal faith maturity predicted 2-year changes in some values and in different directions: Vertical faith maturity predicted higher security and lower self-direction around two years later; horizontal faith maturity predicted higher self-direction and lower security around two years later. Evidence of relationship also goes in the opposite direction: Benevolence predicted positive changes in both vertical and horizontal faith maturity. Future assertions on the predictions of directional relationships between religiosity and values should specify the particular value and religiosity dimension.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/rel/index.aspx-
dc.relation.ispartofPsychology of Religion & Spirituality-
dc.rights©American Psychological Association, 2018. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000175-
dc.titleCausal relationship between religiosity and value priorities: Cross-sectional and longitudinal investigations-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, WYS: swychan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailHui, HCC: huiharry@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHui, HCC=rp00547-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/rel0000175-
dc.identifier.hkuros291484-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage77-
dc.identifier.epage87-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats