File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Partial or total glans resurfacing with partial thickness skin graft reconstruction to maximize cosmetic and functional outcomes in patients with malignant and benign penile diseases – our initial experience

TitlePartial or total glans resurfacing with partial thickness skin graft reconstruction to maximize cosmetic and functional outcomes in patients with malignant and benign penile diseases – our initial experience
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/
Citation
The 23rd Hong Kong Urological Assoication Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 4 November 2018. In BJU International, v. 123 n. S1, p. 4-5 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Patients with penile tumours or severe Lichen Sclerosus et atrophicus (LS) refractory to medical treatment historically require partial penile amputation. Recently, various organ‐preservation techniques have been developed to improve functional and cosmetic outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyse our initial experience in partial or total glans‐resurfacing concerning their oncological, cosmetic and functional outcomes Patients and Methods: Prospective patients with penile tumours or severe LS treated with glans‐resurfacing were enrolled between July 2017 to July 2018. Oncological and functional outcomes, cosmesis and patient satisfaction were assessed during follow up. Results: 4 patients were eligible. 2 patients had total glans‐resurfacing reconstructed with partial thickness skin graft, and the remaining 2 had partial. 2 patients had G3pT1 penile cancer. One patient had severe giant condyloma acuminata, 1 had severe LS, both refractory to medical treatment. No peri‐operative complication was reported. Surgical margins were clear for both penile cancer patients. All patients had complete graft take. Median cosmesis score was 5 out of 5 on visual analog scale. All patients remained sexually active following surgery. Conclusion: Glans resurfacing is a feasible organ‐preserving surgical option in correctly selected patients for both malignant and benign penile diseases, with excellent functional and oncological outcomes.
DescriptionOral Presentation
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266483
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 4.806
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.009

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, AHG-
dc.contributor.authorYuen, SKK-
dc.contributor.authorHo, SHB-
dc.contributor.authorLai, TCT-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, CF-
dc.contributor.authorNg, ATL-
dc.contributor.authorMa, WK-
dc.contributor.authorTsu, HLJ-
dc.contributor.authorLam, PW-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-18T08:20:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-18T08:20:33Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationThe 23rd Hong Kong Urological Assoication Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 4 November 2018. In BJU International, v. 123 n. S1, p. 4-5-
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266483-
dc.descriptionOral Presentation-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Patients with penile tumours or severe Lichen Sclerosus et atrophicus (LS) refractory to medical treatment historically require partial penile amputation. Recently, various organ‐preservation techniques have been developed to improve functional and cosmetic outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyse our initial experience in partial or total glans‐resurfacing concerning their oncological, cosmetic and functional outcomes Patients and Methods: Prospective patients with penile tumours or severe LS treated with glans‐resurfacing were enrolled between July 2017 to July 2018. Oncological and functional outcomes, cosmesis and patient satisfaction were assessed during follow up. Results: 4 patients were eligible. 2 patients had total glans‐resurfacing reconstructed with partial thickness skin graft, and the remaining 2 had partial. 2 patients had G3pT1 penile cancer. One patient had severe giant condyloma acuminata, 1 had severe LS, both refractory to medical treatment. No peri‐operative complication was reported. Surgical margins were clear for both penile cancer patients. All patients had complete graft take. Median cosmesis score was 5 out of 5 on visual analog scale. All patients remained sexually active following surgery. Conclusion: Glans resurfacing is a feasible organ‐preserving surgical option in correctly selected patients for both malignant and benign penile diseases, with excellent functional and oncological outcomes.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofBJU International-
dc.rightsPreprint This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Postprint This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.titlePartial or total glans resurfacing with partial thickness skin graft reconstruction to maximize cosmetic and functional outcomes in patients with malignant and benign penile diseases – our initial experience-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailHo, SHB: hobrian@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailNg, ATL: ada5022@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailMa, WK: mwk054@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailTsu, HLJ: jamestsu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, PW: lamwayne@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, PW=rp02305-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.14677-
dc.identifier.hkuros296740-
dc.identifier.volume123-
dc.identifier.issueS1-
dc.identifier.spage4-
dc.identifier.epage5-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats