File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Organisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences

TitleOrganisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences
Authors
Keywordsacademic research
Autonomy
collegiality
research agendas
social sciences
Issue Date2020
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/03075079.asp
Citation
Studies in Higher Education, 2020, v. 45 n. 12, p. 2382-2397 How to Cite?
AbstractThe demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes. © 2019, © 2019 Society for Research into Higher Education.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/274083
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.017
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.744
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHorta, H-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, JM-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-18T14:54:42Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-18T14:54:42Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationStudies in Higher Education, 2020, v. 45 n. 12, p. 2382-2397-
dc.identifier.issn0307-5079-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/274083-
dc.description.abstractThe demands for academic research placed on contemporary universities are closely related to the levels of innovative research they are expected to produce. Concurrently, both governments and university management strive to make the production of academic research more cost-efficient and have implemented measures to ensure this. Top-down policies influenced by the concepts of new public management and managerialism have been introduced, pushing for competitiveness and increased performativity in academic research setups. These policies and guidelines have been criticised by academics as having eroded collegiality and autonomy, which are considered necessary to achieve quality research. The focus of this study is on the social sciences and aligns with this critique, demonstrating that autonomy and collegiality are the key organisational features fostering multidisciplinary, collaborative and riskier research agendas that lead to breakthroughs. Academics with high levels of organisational commitment are more likely to create research agendas that assume more conservative, discipline-bound and risk-averse traits, with less potential to achieve the intended innovative research outcomes. © 2019, © 2019 Society for Research into Higher Education.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/03075079.asp-
dc.relation.ispartofStudies in Higher Education-
dc.rightsPreprint: This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI]. Postprint: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI].-
dc.subjectacademic research-
dc.subjectAutonomy-
dc.subjectcollegiality-
dc.subjectresearch agendas-
dc.subjectsocial sciences-
dc.titleOrganisational factors and academic research agendas: an analysis of academics in the social sciences-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHorta, H: horta@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHorta, H=rp01959-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03075079.2019.1612351-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85065408241-
dc.identifier.hkuros302130-
dc.identifier.volume45-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.spage2382-
dc.identifier.epage2397-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000591417000002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0307-5079-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats