File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Capturing the uniqueness of individual student learning through innovative assessment of students' internship experience

TitleCapturing the uniqueness of individual student learning through innovative assessment of students' internship experience
Authors
Keywordsexperiential learning
internship
assessment
learning outcomes
Issue Date2018
PublisherIATED Academy. The Proceedings' web site is located at http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018
Citation
10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN18), Palma, Spain. 2-4 July 2018. In Chova, LG ... (et al) (eds.) EDULEARN18 Proceedings, p. 3223-3230 How to Cite?
AbstractThe contribution of internship programmes in developing students’ generic competencies such as teamwork skills, adaptability, self-management skill, interpersonal and communication skills, is well-supported in the literature (Crebert, et al., 2004; Little & Harvey, 2006). However, due to the varying experience amongst individual students, the identification of learning outcomes of students’ internship experience continues to be a challenge, particularly in relation to generic competencies (Hu, Abadeer, & Yusman, 2009). As a result, teachers often come up with intended learning outcomes which are either too vague (e.g. students should be able to gain solid, practical experience in a placement related to the field of information technology) or too narrow (e.g. students should be able to identify and evaluate potential health and safety issues in construction activities). Even when attempts are made to indicate the development of generic competencies, such as the ability to communicate and interact effectively with others in the team, it is questionable whether current assessment methods can effectively assess the development of these generic competencies. Current assessment methods used for assessing student learning in internship are limited to the use of internship report, daily or weekly log and performance appraisal from the work supervisor. Although performance appraisal often complement the internship report, it is often very brief and provides very little detail on students’ achievement and on their generic competencies development (McNamara, 2013). Without a better solution, it is common for students to be graded on a pass or fail basis. In this presentation, findings from a research project on engineering internship experience will be presented to illustrate the uniqueness of each individual student’s experience, as well as the discrepancies between their perceived learning outcomes and what is being assessed. Based on the findings, we will discuss how the unique learning outcomes of each individual student can be identified and assessed by giving students more flexibility and responsibility in creating their own learning experience. References: [1] Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C.J., & Cragnolini, V. (2004). Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: Graduates' perceptions. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(2), 147-165. [2] Hu, X., Abadeer, O., & Yusman, C. (2009). Evaluation of engineering work experience programs (I): Principles. Paper presented at the Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Adelaide. [3] Little, B., & Harvey, L. (2006). Learning through work placements and beyond. UK: The Higher Education Academy. [4] McNamara, J. (2013). The challenge of assessing professional competence in work integrated learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 183-197.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277941
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuk, YYL-
dc.contributor.authorChan, CKY-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T08:04:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-04T08:04:20Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citation10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN18), Palma, Spain. 2-4 July 2018. In Chova, LG ... (et al) (eds.) EDULEARN18 Proceedings, p. 3223-3230-
dc.identifier.isbn978-84-09-02709-5-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277941-
dc.description.abstractThe contribution of internship programmes in developing students’ generic competencies such as teamwork skills, adaptability, self-management skill, interpersonal and communication skills, is well-supported in the literature (Crebert, et al., 2004; Little & Harvey, 2006). However, due to the varying experience amongst individual students, the identification of learning outcomes of students’ internship experience continues to be a challenge, particularly in relation to generic competencies (Hu, Abadeer, & Yusman, 2009). As a result, teachers often come up with intended learning outcomes which are either too vague (e.g. students should be able to gain solid, practical experience in a placement related to the field of information technology) or too narrow (e.g. students should be able to identify and evaluate potential health and safety issues in construction activities). Even when attempts are made to indicate the development of generic competencies, such as the ability to communicate and interact effectively with others in the team, it is questionable whether current assessment methods can effectively assess the development of these generic competencies. Current assessment methods used for assessing student learning in internship are limited to the use of internship report, daily or weekly log and performance appraisal from the work supervisor. Although performance appraisal often complement the internship report, it is often very brief and provides very little detail on students’ achievement and on their generic competencies development (McNamara, 2013). Without a better solution, it is common for students to be graded on a pass or fail basis. In this presentation, findings from a research project on engineering internship experience will be presented to illustrate the uniqueness of each individual student’s experience, as well as the discrepancies between their perceived learning outcomes and what is being assessed. Based on the findings, we will discuss how the unique learning outcomes of each individual student can be identified and assessed by giving students more flexibility and responsibility in creating their own learning experience. References: [1] Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C.J., & Cragnolini, V. (2004). Developing generic skills at university, during work placement and in employment: Graduates' perceptions. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(2), 147-165. [2] Hu, X., Abadeer, O., & Yusman, C. (2009). Evaluation of engineering work experience programs (I): Principles. Paper presented at the Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Adelaide. [3] Little, B., & Harvey, L. (2006). Learning through work placements and beyond. UK: The Higher Education Academy. [4] McNamara, J. (2013). The challenge of assessing professional competence in work integrated learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 183-197.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherIATED Academy. The Proceedings' web site is located at http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018-
dc.relation.ispartofEDULEARN18 Proceedings: 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies-
dc.subjectexperiential learning-
dc.subjectinternship-
dc.subjectassessment-
dc.subjectlearning outcomes-
dc.titleCapturing the uniqueness of individual student learning through innovative assessment of students' internship experience-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailLuk, YYL: lyyluk@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, CKY: ckchan09@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, CKY=rp00892-
dc.identifier.doi10.21125/edulearn.2018.0850-
dc.identifier.hkuros306405-
dc.identifier.spage3223-
dc.identifier.epage3230-
dc.publisher.placePalma, Spain-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats