File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of instrumentation systems on endotoxin reduction from root canal systems: A systematic review of clinical studies and meta-analysis

TitleEffect of instrumentation systems on endotoxin reduction from root canal systems: A systematic review of clinical studies and meta-analysis
Authors
Keywordsendotoxin
kinetic chromogenic limulus amebocyte lysate assay
lipopolysaccharide
reciprocation
rotary
Issue Date2019
PublisherWiley, published in association with Australian Society of Endodontology. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1747-4477
Citation
Australian Endodontic Journal, 2019, v. 45 n. 3, p. 407-413 How to Cite?
AbstractThis systematic review assessed the effect of different root canal instrumentation systems on endotoxin reduction from the root canal system. The literature search was conducted in two electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) using specific key words. The search strategy followed the PRISMA guidelines. Qualitative synthesis and quantitative synthesis of the data were performed and data interpretation was done based on the guidelines in the Cochrane Handbook. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane criteria. The initial search yielded 600 citations, of which three papers met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Studies showed a significant reduction in endotoxin following rotary and reciprocating instrumentation, with no significant differences between them. The meta‐analysis showed no statistical significant difference between reciprocation and rotary files (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the instrumentation techniques compared in this review decrease endotoxin content from root canals, with no significant difference between them.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/279439
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 1.12
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.513

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeelakantan, P-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, HMA-
dc.contributor.authorChang, JWW-
dc.contributor.authorNabhan, MS-
dc.contributor.authorWei, X-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, GSP-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, BPFA-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-01T07:17:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-01T07:17:23Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Endodontic Journal, 2019, v. 45 n. 3, p. 407-413-
dc.identifier.issn1329-1947-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/279439-
dc.description.abstractThis systematic review assessed the effect of different root canal instrumentation systems on endotoxin reduction from the root canal system. The literature search was conducted in two electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) using specific key words. The search strategy followed the PRISMA guidelines. Qualitative synthesis and quantitative synthesis of the data were performed and data interpretation was done based on the guidelines in the Cochrane Handbook. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane criteria. The initial search yielded 600 citations, of which three papers met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Studies showed a significant reduction in endotoxin following rotary and reciprocating instrumentation, with no significant differences between them. The meta‐analysis showed no statistical significant difference between reciprocation and rotary files (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the instrumentation techniques compared in this review decrease endotoxin content from root canals, with no significant difference between them.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley, published in association with Australian Society of Endodontology. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1747-4477-
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Endodontic Journal-
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.subjectendotoxin-
dc.subjectkinetic chromogenic limulus amebocyte lysate assay-
dc.subjectlipopolysaccharide-
dc.subjectreciprocation-
dc.subjectrotary-
dc.titleEffect of instrumentation systems on endotoxin reduction from root canal systems: A systematic review of clinical studies and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailNeelakantan, P: prasanna@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChang, JWW: jwwchang@connect.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, GSP: spcheung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityNeelakantan, P=rp02214-
dc.identifier.authorityChang, JWW=rp00046-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, GSP=rp00016-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aej.12333-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85057711469-
dc.identifier.hkuros308410-
dc.identifier.volume45-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage407-
dc.identifier.epage413-
dc.publisher.placeAustralia-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats