File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using pethidine or fentanyl

TitleComparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using pethidine or fentanyl
Authors
KeywordsAnalgesia: patient-controlled analgesia
Analgesics: pethidine, fentanyl
Anaesthesia: epidural, caesarean
Issue Date1997
Citation
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1997, v. 25, n. 2, p. 126-132 How to Cite?
AbstractWe compared patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) using pethidine or fentanyl in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of 80 patients after caesarean section. Patients received pethidine by PCEA or PCIA, or fentanyl by PCEA or PCIA, with a crossover of the route of administration at 12 h. For pethidine, pain scores were lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 4 to 16 h (P < 0.05). Pethidine consumption was lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 12 to 24 h (P = 0.0005). Patients preferred PCEA to PCIA (P = 0.015). For fentanyl, pain scores were lower with PCEA vs PCIA at 12 h (P = 0.045). Fentanyl consumption was lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 0 to 12 h (P = 0.0007). Patients had similar preference for PCEA and PCIA. Pain scores and side-effects were similar between drugs. Plasma pethidine was similar between groups. Plasma fentanyl was higher with PCIA vs PCEA at 12 h (P = 0.002). PCEA has advantages over PCIA and pethidine may be the preferred drug.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280457
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.512
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.494
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNgan Kee, W. D.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, K. K.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, P. P.-
dc.contributor.authorGin, T.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T14:34:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-17T14:34:05Z-
dc.date.issued1997-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1997, v. 25, n. 2, p. 126-132-
dc.identifier.issn0310-057X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280457-
dc.description.abstractWe compared patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) using pethidine or fentanyl in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of 80 patients after caesarean section. Patients received pethidine by PCEA or PCIA, or fentanyl by PCEA or PCIA, with a crossover of the route of administration at 12 h. For pethidine, pain scores were lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 4 to 16 h (P < 0.05). Pethidine consumption was lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 12 to 24 h (P = 0.0005). Patients preferred PCEA to PCIA (P = 0.015). For fentanyl, pain scores were lower with PCEA vs PCIA at 12 h (P = 0.045). Fentanyl consumption was lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 0 to 12 h (P = 0.0007). Patients had similar preference for PCEA and PCIA. Pain scores and side-effects were similar between drugs. Plasma pethidine was similar between groups. Plasma fentanyl was higher with PCIA vs PCEA at 12 h (P = 0.002). PCEA has advantages over PCIA and pethidine may be the preferred drug.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAnaesthesia and Intensive Care-
dc.subjectAnalgesia: patient-controlled analgesia-
dc.subjectAnalgesics: pethidine, fentanyl-
dc.subjectAnaesthesia: epidural, caesarean-
dc.titleComparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using pethidine or fentanyl-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0310057X9702500203-
dc.identifier.pmid9127653-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0030934523-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage126-
dc.identifier.epage132-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1997WU26200003-
dc.identifier.issnl0310-057X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats