File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Re-examining teaching and learning in citizenship education: a tale of two Chinese cities

TitleRe-examining teaching and learning in citizenship education: a tale of two Chinese cities
Authors
KeywordsCitizenship education
pedagogies
indoctrination
inquiry-based approach
China
Issue Date2020
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00220272.asp
Citation
Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2020, v. 52 n. 1, p. 138-159 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article compares and re-examines citizenship education (CE) teaching and learning in Hong Kong (HK) and Guangzhou (GZ), China. It questions two stereotypical perceptions—that China schools indoctrinate students, and that CE lessons in HK are more open than those in mainland China. Data are drawn from some 30 lesson observations, 1,200 questionnaires, and 80 teacher/student interviews from six sampled HK and GZ schools. The study used NVivo to examine qualitative data, and employed hierarchical linear modelling with the help of SPSS and AMOS to analyse quantitative data. The findings suggest both cities are similar in terms of teaching/learning CE, due to globalization and domestic changes, and have similar CE conditions more conducive to open pedagogies (e.g., inquiry-based approaches) than indoctrination. HK’s greater socioeconomic openness does not ensure its CE is more open than GZ’s, for pedagogical and non-pedagogical reasons.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/284870
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.175
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.982
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLaw, WW-
dc.contributor.authorXu, S-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T09:03:42Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-07T09:03:42Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Curriculum Studies, 2020, v. 52 n. 1, p. 138-159-
dc.identifier.issn0022-0272-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/284870-
dc.description.abstractThis article compares and re-examines citizenship education (CE) teaching and learning in Hong Kong (HK) and Guangzhou (GZ), China. It questions two stereotypical perceptions—that China schools indoctrinate students, and that CE lessons in HK are more open than those in mainland China. Data are drawn from some 30 lesson observations, 1,200 questionnaires, and 80 teacher/student interviews from six sampled HK and GZ schools. The study used NVivo to examine qualitative data, and employed hierarchical linear modelling with the help of SPSS and AMOS to analyse quantitative data. The findings suggest both cities are similar in terms of teaching/learning CE, due to globalization and domestic changes, and have similar CE conditions more conducive to open pedagogies (e.g., inquiry-based approaches) than indoctrination. HK’s greater socioeconomic openness does not ensure its CE is more open than GZ’s, for pedagogical and non-pedagogical reasons.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00220272.asp-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Curriculum Studies-
dc.rightsPostprint: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [Journal of Curriculum Studies] on [2020], available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220272.2019.1605410-
dc.subjectCitizenship education-
dc.subjectpedagogies-
dc.subjectindoctrination-
dc.subjectinquiry-based approach-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.titleRe-examining teaching and learning in citizenship education: a tale of two Chinese cities-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLaw, WW: wwlaw@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLaw, WW=rp00921-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00220272.2019.1605410-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85064624657-
dc.identifier.hkuros311757-
dc.identifier.volume52-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage138-
dc.identifier.epage159-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000466004100001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0022-0272-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats