File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effects of a modestly lower carbohydrate diet in gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

TitleEffects of a modestly lower carbohydrate diet in gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Keywordslower carbohydrate
gestational diabetes
ketones
diet
MAMI study
Issue Date2020
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP): ASN. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ajcn.org/
Citation
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2020, v. 112 n. 2, p. 284-292 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Lower carbohydrate diets have the potential to improve glycemia but may increase ketonemia in women with gestational diabetes (GDM). We hypothesized that modestly lower carbohydrate intake would not increase ketonemia. Objective: To compare blood ketone concentration, risk of ketonemia, and pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM randomly assigned to a lower carbohydrate diet or routine care. Methods: Forty-six women aged (mean ± SEM) 33.3 ± 0.6 y and prepregnancy BMI 26.8 ± 0.9 kg/m2 were randomly assigned at 28.5 ± 0.4 wk to a modestly lower carbohydrate diet (MLC, ∼135 g/d carbohydrate) or routine care (RC, ∼200 g/d) for 6 wk. Blood ketones were ascertained by finger prick test strips and 3-d food diaries were collected at baseline and end of the intervention. Results: There were no detectable differences in blood ketones between completers in the MLC group compared with the RC group (0.1 ± 0.0 compared with 0.1 ± 0.0 mmol/L, n = 33, P = 0.31, respectively), even though carbohydrate and total energy intake were significantly lower in the intervention group (carbohydrate 165 ± 7 compared with 190 ± 9 g, P = 0.04; energy 7040 ± 240 compared with 8230 ± 320 kJ, P <0.01, respectively). Only 20% of participants in the MLC group met the target intake compared with 65% in the RC group (P <0.01). There were no differences in birth weight, rate of large-for-gestational-age infants, percent fat mass, or fat-free mass between groups. Conclusions: An intervention to reduce carbohydrate intake in GDM did not raise ketones to clinical significance, possibly because the target of 135 g/d was difficult to achieve in pregnancy. Feeding studies with food provision may be needed to assess the benefits and risks of low-carbohydrate diets. This trial was registered at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12616000018415.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287825
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 8.472
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.608
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMijatovic, J-
dc.contributor.authorLouie, JCY-
dc.contributor.authorBuso, MEC-
dc.contributor.authorAtkinson, FS-
dc.contributor.authorRoss, GP-
dc.contributor.authorMarkovic, TP-
dc.contributor.authorBrand-Miller, JC-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T12:03:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T12:03:50Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2020, v. 112 n. 2, p. 284-292-
dc.identifier.issn0002-9165-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287825-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lower carbohydrate diets have the potential to improve glycemia but may increase ketonemia in women with gestational diabetes (GDM). We hypothesized that modestly lower carbohydrate intake would not increase ketonemia. Objective: To compare blood ketone concentration, risk of ketonemia, and pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM randomly assigned to a lower carbohydrate diet or routine care. Methods: Forty-six women aged (mean ± SEM) 33.3 ± 0.6 y and prepregnancy BMI 26.8 ± 0.9 kg/m2 were randomly assigned at 28.5 ± 0.4 wk to a modestly lower carbohydrate diet (MLC, ∼135 g/d carbohydrate) or routine care (RC, ∼200 g/d) for 6 wk. Blood ketones were ascertained by finger prick test strips and 3-d food diaries were collected at baseline and end of the intervention. Results: There were no detectable differences in blood ketones between completers in the MLC group compared with the RC group (0.1 ± 0.0 compared with 0.1 ± 0.0 mmol/L, n = 33, P = 0.31, respectively), even though carbohydrate and total energy intake were significantly lower in the intervention group (carbohydrate 165 ± 7 compared with 190 ± 9 g, P = 0.04; energy 7040 ± 240 compared with 8230 ± 320 kJ, P <0.01, respectively). Only 20% of participants in the MLC group met the target intake compared with 65% in the RC group (P <0.01). There were no differences in birth weight, rate of large-for-gestational-age infants, percent fat mass, or fat-free mass between groups. Conclusions: An intervention to reduce carbohydrate intake in GDM did not raise ketones to clinical significance, possibly because the target of 135 g/d was difficult to achieve in pregnancy. Feeding studies with food provision may be needed to assess the benefits and risks of low-carbohydrate diets. This trial was registered at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12616000018415.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP): ASN. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ajcn.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition-
dc.subjectlower carbohydrate-
dc.subjectgestational diabetes-
dc.subjectketones-
dc.subjectdiet-
dc.subjectMAMI study-
dc.titleEffects of a modestly lower carbohydrate diet in gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLouie, JCY: jimmyl@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLouie, JCY=rp02118-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ajcn/nqaa137-
dc.identifier.pmid32537643-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85089125453-
dc.identifier.hkuros314712-
dc.identifier.volume112-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage284-
dc.identifier.epage292-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000561751100009-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0002-9165-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats