File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/arisoc/aoz016
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85075369706
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The Cluelessness Objection Revisited
Title | The Cluelessness Objection Revisited |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Consequentialist Actualism Ethical Theory |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://aristotelian.oxfordjournals.org/ |
Citation | Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2019, v. 119 n. 3, p. 321-324 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Lenman (2000)'s cluelessness objection against consequentialism states that we are almost entirely clueless to the actual consequences of our action. In ‘Cluelessness,’ Hilary Greaves (2016) distinguishes between ‘simple’ and ‘complex’ cases of cluelessness and argues that the principle of indifference applies to ‘simple’ cases, thereby rescuing the ‘simple’ cases from the cluelessness objection. In this discussion note, I argue that Greaves's distinction between ‘simple’ and ‘complex’ cases fails and cluelessness is more problematic than Greaves believes. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/290909 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.522 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | YIM, LL | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-02T05:48:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-02T05:48:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 2019, v. 119 n. 3, p. 321-324 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0066-7374 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/290909 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Lenman (2000)'s cluelessness objection against consequentialism states that we are almost entirely clueless to the actual consequences of our action. In ‘Cluelessness,’ Hilary Greaves (2016) distinguishes between ‘simple’ and ‘complex’ cases of cluelessness and argues that the principle of indifference applies to ‘simple’ cases, thereby rescuing the ‘simple’ cases from the cluelessness objection. In this discussion note, I argue that Greaves's distinction between ‘simple’ and ‘complex’ cases fails and cluelessness is more problematic than Greaves believes. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://aristotelian.oxfordjournals.org/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society | - |
dc.rights | Pre-print: Journal Title] ©: [year] [owner as specified on the article] Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of xxxxxx]. All rights reserved. Pre-print (Once an article is published, preprint notice should be amended to): This is an electronic version of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final version of the Article as published in the print edition of the Journal.] Post-print: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: xxxxxxx [insert URL that the author will receive upon publication here]. | - |
dc.subject | Consequentialist | - |
dc.subject | Actualism | - |
dc.subject | Ethical Theory | - |
dc.title | The Cluelessness Objection Revisited | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | YIM, LL: loklam95@connect.hku.hk | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/arisoc/aoz016 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85075369706 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 317621 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 119 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 321 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 324 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0066-7374 | - |