File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Article: Feminist Literary Theory and the Law: Reading Cases with Naomi Schor

TitleFeminist Literary Theory and the Law: Reading Cases with Naomi Schor
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherSpringer. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0966-3622
Citation
Feminist Legal Studies, 2018, v. 26 n. 2, p. 163-183 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article brings together feminist literary theory and law by approaching a number of U.S. Federal cases on sex equality in light of the work of the renowned feminist literary critic Naomi Schor, and shows that literary theory constitutes an under-explored resource for feminist legal critique. Schor’s writings constitute a sustained rumination on the relationship between reading and feminism. Drawing on writings on language and the body by key French feminist theorists, Schor advances a method of interpretation which she terms, provocatively, ‘clitoral reading’, and which focuses on the place of details relating to women’s bodies and desires within literary and cultural discourses. In the course of her career, she analysed texts from domains as diverse as literature, philosophy, visual art, the history of fashion, and photography. I will demonstrate that her work can make a valuable contribution to legal studies by using it as an interpretative lens to re-examine U.S. Federal court judgments.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293367

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWan, MMH-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T08:15:43Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-23T08:15:43Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationFeminist Legal Studies, 2018, v. 26 n. 2, p. 163-183-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293367-
dc.description.abstractThis article brings together feminist literary theory and law by approaching a number of U.S. Federal cases on sex equality in light of the work of the renowned feminist literary critic Naomi Schor, and shows that literary theory constitutes an under-explored resource for feminist legal critique. Schor’s writings constitute a sustained rumination on the relationship between reading and feminism. Drawing on writings on language and the body by key French feminist theorists, Schor advances a method of interpretation which she terms, provocatively, ‘clitoral reading’, and which focuses on the place of details relating to women’s bodies and desires within literary and cultural discourses. In the course of her career, she analysed texts from domains as diverse as literature, philosophy, visual art, the history of fashion, and photography. I will demonstrate that her work can make a valuable contribution to legal studies by using it as an interpretative lens to re-examine U.S. Federal court judgments.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0966-3622-
dc.relation.ispartofFeminist Legal Studies-
dc.rightsThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in [insert journal title]. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/[insert DOI]-
dc.titleFeminist Literary Theory and the Law: Reading Cases with Naomi Schor-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWan, MMH: mwan@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWan, MMH=rp01272-
dc.identifier.hkuros319637-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage163-
dc.identifier.epage183-
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats