File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge

TitleComparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge
Authors
Keywordsvalidation framework
machine learning
polyp detection
Endoscopic vision
handcrafted features
Issue Date2017
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2017, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1231-1249 How to Cite?
AbstractColonoscopy is the gold standard for colon cancer screening though some polyps are still missed, thus preventing early disease detection and treatment. Several computational systems have been proposed to assist polyp detection during colonoscopy but so far without consistent evaluation. The lack of publicly available annotated databases has made it difficult to compare methods and to assess if they achieve performance levels acceptable for clinical use. The Automatic Polyp Detection sub-challenge, conducted as part of the Endoscopic Vision Challenge (http://endovis.grand-challenge.org) at the international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2015, was an effort to address this need. In this paper, we report the results of this comparative evaluation of polyp detection methods, as well as describe additional experiments to further explore differences between methods. We define performance metrics and provide evaluation databases that allow comparison of multiple methodologies. Results show that convolutional neural networks are the state of the art. Nevertheless, it is also demonstrated that combining different methodologies can lead to an improved overall performance.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/299550
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 11.037
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.322
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBernal, Jorge-
dc.contributor.authorTajkbaksh, Nima-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez, Francisco Javier-
dc.contributor.authorMatuszewski, Bogdan J.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hao-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Lequan-
dc.contributor.authorAngermann, Quentin-
dc.contributor.authorRomain, Olivier-
dc.contributor.authorRustad, Bjorn-
dc.contributor.authorBalasingham, Ilangko-
dc.contributor.authorPogorelov, Konstantin-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Sungbin-
dc.contributor.authorDebard, Quentin-
dc.contributor.authorMaier-Hein, Lena-
dc.contributor.authorSpeidel, Stefanie-
dc.contributor.authorStoyanov, Danail-
dc.contributor.authorBrandao, Patrick-
dc.contributor.authorCordova, Henry-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Montes, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorGurudu, Suryakanth R.-
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Esparrach, Gloria-
dc.contributor.authorDray, Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Jianming-
dc.contributor.authorHistace, Aymeric-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-21T03:34:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-21T03:34:39Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2017, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1231-1249-
dc.identifier.issn0278-0062-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/299550-
dc.description.abstractColonoscopy is the gold standard for colon cancer screening though some polyps are still missed, thus preventing early disease detection and treatment. Several computational systems have been proposed to assist polyp detection during colonoscopy but so far without consistent evaluation. The lack of publicly available annotated databases has made it difficult to compare methods and to assess if they achieve performance levels acceptable for clinical use. The Automatic Polyp Detection sub-challenge, conducted as part of the Endoscopic Vision Challenge (http://endovis.grand-challenge.org) at the international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2015, was an effort to address this need. In this paper, we report the results of this comparative evaluation of polyp detection methods, as well as describe additional experiments to further explore differences between methods. We define performance metrics and provide evaluation databases that allow comparison of multiple methodologies. Results show that convolutional neural networks are the state of the art. Nevertheless, it is also demonstrated that combining different methodologies can lead to an improved overall performance.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging-
dc.subjectvalidation framework-
dc.subjectmachine learning-
dc.subjectpolyp detection-
dc.subjectEndoscopic vision-
dc.subjecthandcrafted features-
dc.titleComparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042-
dc.identifier.pmid28182555-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85021449496-
dc.identifier.volume36-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1231-
dc.identifier.epage1249-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-254X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000402722500003-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats