File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Internal rotation of femoral component in total knee replacement: Is it safe?

TitleInternal rotation of femoral component in total knee replacement: Is it safe?
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association.
Citation
The 40th Annual Congress of The Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA), Hong Kong, 31 October –1 November 2020, p. 33 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: The target for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty has often been parallel to transepicondylar axis (TEA), yet outliers can still occur. The objective of this study was to investigate the mid-term results of patients with internally rotated femoral components. Materials and Methods: In total, 79 TKAs performed between September 2016- March 2017 were prospectively followed up. Femoral component rotation determination was randomised to either measured resection (MR) or gap balancing GB) technique. CT scans performed showed internal rotation of the femoral component was more common using either method. The effect of internal rotation of femoral components on clinical outcomes was analysed. Results: In total, 79 patients completed the study with mean follow-up of 43 months. Of them, 61 knees (77%) had internally rotated femoral components with 17 (21.5%) exceeding 3°. The mean rotation of the MR and GB groups were 1.51° (SD 1.72) and 1.47° (SD 2.21), respectively and not significantly different. All implants survived without patella dislocation. Using >3° internal rotation from TEA as cut-off for acceptable internal rotation, Knee Society functional assessment at 3 months was marginally inferior in the internally rotated group (KSFA 3 months: 52 vs 58, p=0.06) but the effect washed out beyond 6 months. No differences were observed in Knee Society knee score. Discussion and Conclusion: Mild internal rotation of femoral components did not jeopardise clinical or functional outcomes. Femoral component rotation can be safely adjusted to achieve soft tissue balancing such as in the setting of robotic TKA.
DescriptionFree Paper Session I: Adult Joint Reconstruction I - no. FP1.12
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306184

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFu, CHH-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, MHS-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, YLA-
dc.contributor.authorChan, PK-
dc.contributor.authorYan, CH-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, PKY-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T10:19:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-20T10:19:59Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThe 40th Annual Congress of The Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA), Hong Kong, 31 October –1 November 2020, p. 33-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306184-
dc.descriptionFree Paper Session I: Adult Joint Reconstruction I - no. FP1.12-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The target for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty has often been parallel to transepicondylar axis (TEA), yet outliers can still occur. The objective of this study was to investigate the mid-term results of patients with internally rotated femoral components. Materials and Methods: In total, 79 TKAs performed between September 2016- March 2017 were prospectively followed up. Femoral component rotation determination was randomised to either measured resection (MR) or gap balancing GB) technique. CT scans performed showed internal rotation of the femoral component was more common using either method. The effect of internal rotation of femoral components on clinical outcomes was analysed. Results: In total, 79 patients completed the study with mean follow-up of 43 months. Of them, 61 knees (77%) had internally rotated femoral components with 17 (21.5%) exceeding 3°. The mean rotation of the MR and GB groups were 1.51° (SD 1.72) and 1.47° (SD 2.21), respectively and not significantly different. All implants survived without patella dislocation. Using >3° internal rotation from TEA as cut-off for acceptable internal rotation, Knee Society functional assessment at 3 months was marginally inferior in the internally rotated group (KSFA 3 months: 52 vs 58, p=0.06) but the effect washed out beyond 6 months. No differences were observed in Knee Society knee score. Discussion and Conclusion: Mild internal rotation of femoral components did not jeopardise clinical or functional outcomes. Femoral component rotation can be safely adjusted to achieve soft tissue balancing such as in the setting of robotic TKA.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association.-
dc.relation.ispartofThe 40th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association Annual Congress, 2020-
dc.rightsThe 40th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association Annual Congress, 2020. Copyright © Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association.-
dc.titleInternal rotation of femoral component in total knee replacement: Is it safe?-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailFu, CHH: drhfu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, MHS: steveort@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, YLA: amyorth@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, PK: cpk464@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChiu, PKY: pkychiu@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, MHS=rp02253-
dc.identifier.authorityYan, CH=rp00303-
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, PKY=rp00379-
dc.identifier.hkuros326790-
dc.identifier.spage33-
dc.identifier.epage33-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats