File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Treatment for severe lupus nephritis: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China

TitleTreatment for severe lupus nephritis: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China
Authors
KeywordsCost-Effectiveness
severe lupus nephritis
Markov model
therapeutic strategies
clinical prognosis
Issue Date2021
PublisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/pharmacology
Citation
Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2021, v. 12, p. article no. 678301 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common secondary glomerular diseases that will cause end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal-related death. The cost-effectiveness of various treatments for LN recommended by official guidelines has not been investigated in China. Our study is to evaluate clinical prognosis and cost-effectiveness of the current treatments for severe LN. Methods: A Markov model was simulated for 1,000 LN patients of 30 years old, over a 3-years and 30-years lifetime horizon respectively. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of six therapeutic strategies from a societal perspective, with cyclophosphamide (CYC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) induction therapy followed by CYC, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) maintenance therapy. Main outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and clinical prognosis. One and three times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita were used as the willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. We also carried out sensitivity analysis under a lifetime horizon. Results: Compared with the baseline strategy of CYC induction and maintenance, for a 3-years horizon the most cost-effective strategy was CYC induction and AZA maintenance with $448 per QALY gained, followed by MMF induction and AZA maintenance which however was not cost-effective under the one times GDP per capita WTP threshold. For a lifetime horizon, CYC induction and AZA maintenance remained the most cost-effective strategy but MMF induction and maintenance became cost-effective under the one times GDP per capita WTP threshold and achieved a higher complete remission rate (57.2 versus 48.9%) and lower risks of ESRD (3.3 versus 5.8%) and all-cause mortality (36.0 versus 40.8%). The risk of developing ESRD during maintenance was the most influential parameter affecting ICER. Conclusions: The strategy of CYC induction followed by AZA maintenance was the most cost-effective strategy in China for short-term treatment, while the strategy of MMF in both induction and maintenance became cost-effective and yielded more desirable clinical outcomes for lifetime treatment. The uncertainty analysis supported the need for monitoring the progression to ESRD.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306426
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.988
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.384
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDAI, Z-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, X-
dc.contributor.authorWong, IOL-
dc.contributor.authorLau, EHY-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Z-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-22T07:34:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-22T07:34:26Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Pharmacology, 2021, v. 12, p. article no. 678301-
dc.identifier.issn1663-9812-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/306426-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common secondary glomerular diseases that will cause end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal-related death. The cost-effectiveness of various treatments for LN recommended by official guidelines has not been investigated in China. Our study is to evaluate clinical prognosis and cost-effectiveness of the current treatments for severe LN. Methods: A Markov model was simulated for 1,000 LN patients of 30 years old, over a 3-years and 30-years lifetime horizon respectively. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of six therapeutic strategies from a societal perspective, with cyclophosphamide (CYC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) induction therapy followed by CYC, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) maintenance therapy. Main outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and clinical prognosis. One and three times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita were used as the willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. We also carried out sensitivity analysis under a lifetime horizon. Results: Compared with the baseline strategy of CYC induction and maintenance, for a 3-years horizon the most cost-effective strategy was CYC induction and AZA maintenance with $448 per QALY gained, followed by MMF induction and AZA maintenance which however was not cost-effective under the one times GDP per capita WTP threshold. For a lifetime horizon, CYC induction and AZA maintenance remained the most cost-effective strategy but MMF induction and maintenance became cost-effective under the one times GDP per capita WTP threshold and achieved a higher complete remission rate (57.2 versus 48.9%) and lower risks of ESRD (3.3 versus 5.8%) and all-cause mortality (36.0 versus 40.8%). The risk of developing ESRD during maintenance was the most influential parameter affecting ICER. Conclusions: The strategy of CYC induction followed by AZA maintenance was the most cost-effective strategy in China for short-term treatment, while the strategy of MMF in both induction and maintenance became cost-effective and yielded more desirable clinical outcomes for lifetime treatment. The uncertainty analysis supported the need for monitoring the progression to ESRD.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/pharmacology-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Pharmacology-
dc.rightsThis Document is Protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCost-Effectiveness-
dc.subjectsevere lupus nephritis-
dc.subjectMarkov model-
dc.subjecttherapeutic strategies-
dc.subjectclinical prognosis-
dc.titleTreatment for severe lupus nephritis: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWong, IOL: iolwong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLau, EHY: ehylau@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, IOL=rp01806-
dc.identifier.authorityLau, EHY=rp01349-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphar.2021.678301-
dc.identifier.pmid34552479-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC8450585-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85115239217-
dc.identifier.hkuros328937-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 678301-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 678301-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000698631600001-
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats