File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Dark side of environmental regulation: Wage inequality cost

TitleDark side of environmental regulation: Wage inequality cost
Authors
Issue Date2022
Citation
Journal of Comparative Economics, 2022, Forthcoming How to Cite?
AbstractEnvironmental regulations have both bright and dark consequences, and understanding the dark side is critical for policymakers. This paper investigates whether and how environmental regulation exacerbates the wage inequality between skilled and unskilled labor. Employing a triple difference-in-differences (DDD) estimation method on Chinese urban household survey data, we find a 1.7% increase in the wage gap after the implementation of a regional-specific environmental regulation. We show that the enlarged wage gap is mainly due to the intensive margin’s change and is dominated by the polluting sector rather than the non-polluting one. More importantly, the unappealing effect on wage inequality lasts in the long run and is not China-specific, according to our numerical simulation of a general equilibrium model. Finally, we also propose a non-environmental policy instrument to alleviate the negative impact. Overall, our work highlights that environmental regulation may have an unintended wage inequality cost, and our study is of generic policy implications to other economies.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/323397

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Y-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Y-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Y-
dc.contributor.authorChen, X-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-16T10:04:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-16T10:04:48Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Comparative Economics, 2022, Forthcoming-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/323397-
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental regulations have both bright and dark consequences, and understanding the dark side is critical for policymakers. This paper investigates whether and how environmental regulation exacerbates the wage inequality between skilled and unskilled labor. Employing a triple difference-in-differences (DDD) estimation method on Chinese urban household survey data, we find a 1.7% increase in the wage gap after the implementation of a regional-specific environmental regulation. We show that the enlarged wage gap is mainly due to the intensive margin’s change and is dominated by the polluting sector rather than the non-polluting one. More importantly, the unappealing effect on wage inequality lasts in the long run and is not China-specific, according to our numerical simulation of a general equilibrium model. Finally, we also propose a non-environmental policy instrument to alleviate the negative impact. Overall, our work highlights that environmental regulation may have an unintended wage inequality cost, and our study is of generic policy implications to other economies.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Comparative Economics-
dc.titleDark side of environmental regulation: Wage inequality cost-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailZhang, Y: yifeizhang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jce.2022.11.004-
dc.identifier.hkuros343067-
dc.identifier.volumeForthcoming-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats