File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Managerial Overconfidence and Market Feedback Effects

TitleManagerial Overconfidence and Market Feedback Effects
Authors
Issue Date2023
Citation
Management Science, 2023, Forthcoming How to Cite?
AbstractWe show that managerial learning from stock prices can lead to feedback loop vulnerability: corrective actions based on perceived negative market signals reduce the sensitivity of asset payoffs to stock market information. Less sensitivity discourages liquidity provision and increases the price impact of liquidity shocks. Interestingly, overconfident managers who disregard stock price information may be less vulnerable to the adverse price impact of nonfundamental liquidity shocks. Our empirical evidence strongly supports the model’s underlying premises and predictions: First, investment decisions of overconfident CEOs are significantly less responsive to stock price fluctuations. Second, the price impact of liquidity shocks, for example, mutual fund fire sales, is substantially smaller for firms with overconfident CEOs.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324737
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, S-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, S-
dc.contributor.authorNanda, V-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, SC-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T01:36:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-20T01:36:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationManagement Science, 2023, Forthcoming-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/324737-
dc.description.abstractWe show that managerial learning from stock prices can lead to feedback loop vulnerability: corrective actions based on perceived negative market signals reduce the sensitivity of asset payoffs to stock market information. Less sensitivity discourages liquidity provision and increases the price impact of liquidity shocks. Interestingly, overconfident managers who disregard stock price information may be less vulnerable to the adverse price impact of nonfundamental liquidity shocks. Our empirical evidence strongly supports the model’s underlying premises and predictions: First, investment decisions of overconfident CEOs are significantly less responsive to stock price fluctuations. Second, the price impact of liquidity shocks, for example, mutual fund fire sales, is substantially smaller for firms with overconfident CEOs.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofManagement Science-
dc.titleManagerial Overconfidence and Market Feedback Effects-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHuang, S: huangsy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHuang, S=rp02052-
dc.identifier.doi10.1287/mnsc.2022.4625-
dc.identifier.hkuros344048-
dc.identifier.volumeForthcoming-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000920359900001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats