File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Uncovering the Past and Future Climate Drivers of Wheat Yield Shocks in Europe With Machine Learning

TitleUncovering the Past and Future Climate Drivers of Wheat Yield Shocks in Europe With Machine Learning
Authors
Keywordsattribution analysis
extreme climate
extreme warming
random forest
winter wheat
yield shock
Issue Date2021
Citation
Earth's Future, 2021, v. 9, n. 5, article no. e2020EF001815 How to Cite?
AbstractRecently, yield shocks due to extreme weather events and their consequences for food security have become a major concern. Although long yield time series are available in Europe, few studies have been conducted to analyze them in order to investigate the impact of adverse climate events on yield shocks under current and future climate conditions. Here we designated the lowest 10th percentile of the relative yield anomaly as yield shock and analyzed subnational wheat yield shocks across Europe during the last four decades. We applied a data-driven attribution framework to quantify primary climate drivers of wheat yield shock probability based on machine learning and game theory, and used this framework to infer the most critical climate variables that will contribute to yield shocks in the future, under two climate change scenarios. During the period 1980–2018, our attribution analysis showed that 32% of the observed wheat yield shocks were primarily driven by water limitation, making it the leading climate driver. Projection to future climate scenarios RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 suggested an increased risk of yield shock and a paradigm shift from water limitation dominated yield shock to extreme warming induced shocks over 2070–2099: 46% and 54% of areas were primarily driven by extreme warming under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, respectively. A similar analysis conducted on yields simulated by an ensemble of crop models showed that models can capture the negative impact of low water supply but missed the impact of excess water. These discrepancies between observed and simulated yield data call for improvement in crop models.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326284
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Peng-
dc.contributor.authorAbramoff, Rose-
dc.contributor.authorMakowski, David-
dc.contributor.authorCiais, Philippe-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T09:59:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-09T09:59:29Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationEarth's Future, 2021, v. 9, n. 5, article no. e2020EF001815-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326284-
dc.description.abstractRecently, yield shocks due to extreme weather events and their consequences for food security have become a major concern. Although long yield time series are available in Europe, few studies have been conducted to analyze them in order to investigate the impact of adverse climate events on yield shocks under current and future climate conditions. Here we designated the lowest 10th percentile of the relative yield anomaly as yield shock and analyzed subnational wheat yield shocks across Europe during the last four decades. We applied a data-driven attribution framework to quantify primary climate drivers of wheat yield shock probability based on machine learning and game theory, and used this framework to infer the most critical climate variables that will contribute to yield shocks in the future, under two climate change scenarios. During the period 1980–2018, our attribution analysis showed that 32% of the observed wheat yield shocks were primarily driven by water limitation, making it the leading climate driver. Projection to future climate scenarios RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 suggested an increased risk of yield shock and a paradigm shift from water limitation dominated yield shock to extreme warming induced shocks over 2070–2099: 46% and 54% of areas were primarily driven by extreme warming under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, respectively. A similar analysis conducted on yields simulated by an ensemble of crop models showed that models can capture the negative impact of low water supply but missed the impact of excess water. These discrepancies between observed and simulated yield data call for improvement in crop models.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEarth's Future-
dc.subjectattribution analysis-
dc.subjectextreme climate-
dc.subjectextreme warming-
dc.subjectrandom forest-
dc.subjectwinter wheat-
dc.subjectyield shock-
dc.titleUncovering the Past and Future Climate Drivers of Wheat Yield Shocks in Europe With Machine Learning-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2020EF001815-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85106952155-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e2020EF001815-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e2020EF001815-
dc.identifier.eissn2328-4277-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000656968900014-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats