File Download
Supplementary

postgraduate thesis: Trick or cheat? : Hong Kong public views on the age of criminal responsibility

TitleTrick or cheat? : Hong Kong public views on the age of criminal responsibility
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherThe University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong)
Citation
Chan, A. W. L. [陳偉倫], Chan, A. W. Y. [陳詠恩], Kam, A. C. L. [甘澤鎏], Lam, L. Y. W. [林逸蔚], Wong, A. T. F. [王梓鋒], Yip, S. W. F. [葉維發]. (2020). Trick or cheat? : Hong Kong public views on the age of criminal responsibility. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.
AbstractPurpose – This paper aims to review the public opinion towards the Age of Criminal responsibility (ACR) in Hong Kong by summarizing Hong Kong public views and stakeholders’ opinions over what should be the mechanism to deal with juvenile criminal responsibility and the rationale of their suggestions. Design/methodology/approach – The main findings are based on semi-structured interviews with 6 interviewees of various professional backgrounds and online questionnaires from 180 respondents in Hong Kong. Findings – The findings unveiled a spectrum of rationales about the adoption of the ACR in Hong Kong from the individual, social and institutional perspectives. Under the development of one’s criminal intent in the course of socialization, personal factors on top of the ACR, such as family background, education background and mental condition, should also be considered in order to make an individualized sentence to an offender. Meanwhile, rapid technological advancement has had a tremendous impact on children’s maturity in contemporary society, which challenged the existing ACR as well as the parenting methods on juvenile delinquency. The findings also suggest an institutional review on the ACR and the rebuttable presumption of doli incapax in Hong Kong in line with the fundamental principles of juvenile justice. Research limitations/implications – The sole adoption of the ACR to determine one’s criminal responsibility could be effective and efficient but there could be risk inside as well. A wide range of factors and circumstances could hardly be testified to determine one’s guilt in reality. It was also observed that the maturity and criminal intent of children and juveniles continued to evolve particularly in 2019 and 2020 when youth activism emerged along with the social movements in Hong Kong. Originality/value – The findings suggest that there is a foreseeable need for the authorities to review the existing ACR as well as the juvenile justice system in Hong Kong with a view to superseding any outdated legislations or practices.
DegreeMaster of Social Sciences
SubjectCriminal liability - China - Hong Kong
Dept/ProgramCriminology
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/328173

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Alan Wai Lun-
dc.contributor.author陳偉倫-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Aki Wing Yan-
dc.contributor.author陳詠恩-
dc.contributor.authorKam, Angus Chak Lau-
dc.contributor.author甘澤鎏-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Lilian Yat Wai-
dc.contributor.author林逸蔚-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Andrew Tsz Fung-
dc.contributor.author王梓鋒-
dc.contributor.authorYip, Samuel Wai Fat-
dc.contributor.author葉維發-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T09:05:42Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-05T09:05:42Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationChan, A. W. L. [陳偉倫], Chan, A. W. Y. [陳詠恩], Kam, A. C. L. [甘澤鎏], Lam, L. Y. W. [林逸蔚], Wong, A. T. F. [王梓鋒], Yip, S. W. F. [葉維發]. (2020). Trick or cheat? : Hong Kong public views on the age of criminal responsibility. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/328173-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – This paper aims to review the public opinion towards the Age of Criminal responsibility (ACR) in Hong Kong by summarizing Hong Kong public views and stakeholders’ opinions over what should be the mechanism to deal with juvenile criminal responsibility and the rationale of their suggestions. Design/methodology/approach – The main findings are based on semi-structured interviews with 6 interviewees of various professional backgrounds and online questionnaires from 180 respondents in Hong Kong. Findings – The findings unveiled a spectrum of rationales about the adoption of the ACR in Hong Kong from the individual, social and institutional perspectives. Under the development of one’s criminal intent in the course of socialization, personal factors on top of the ACR, such as family background, education background and mental condition, should also be considered in order to make an individualized sentence to an offender. Meanwhile, rapid technological advancement has had a tremendous impact on children’s maturity in contemporary society, which challenged the existing ACR as well as the parenting methods on juvenile delinquency. The findings also suggest an institutional review on the ACR and the rebuttable presumption of doli incapax in Hong Kong in line with the fundamental principles of juvenile justice. Research limitations/implications – The sole adoption of the ACR to determine one’s criminal responsibility could be effective and efficient but there could be risk inside as well. A wide range of factors and circumstances could hardly be testified to determine one’s guilt in reality. It was also observed that the maturity and criminal intent of children and juveniles continued to evolve particularly in 2019 and 2020 when youth activism emerged along with the social movements in Hong Kong. Originality/value – The findings suggest that there is a foreseeable need for the authorities to review the existing ACR as well as the juvenile justice system in Hong Kong with a view to superseding any outdated legislations or practices. -
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherThe University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong)-
dc.relation.ispartofHKU Theses Online (HKUTO)-
dc.rightsThe author retains all proprietary rights, (such as patent rights) and the right to use in future works.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subject.lcshCriminal liability - China - Hong Kong-
dc.titleTrick or cheat? : Hong Kong public views on the age of criminal responsibility-
dc.typePG_Thesis-
dc.description.thesisnameMaster of Social Sciences-
dc.description.thesislevelMaster-
dc.description.thesisdisciplineCriminology-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.date.hkucongregation2020-
dc.identifier.mmsid991044432444503414-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats