File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of smoking-related COVID-19 risk messaging on smoking cessation in community smokers: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial

TitleEffect of smoking-related COVID-19 risk messaging on smoking cessation in community smokers: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial
Authors
KeywordsCOVID-19
health communication
mobile health
smoking cessation
Issue Date14-Jun-2023
PublisherEU European Publishing
Citation
Tobacco Induced Diseases, 2023, v. 21 How to Cite?
Abstract

Introduction:
Observational and experimental studies have suggested that messaging on smoking-related COVID-19 risk may promote smoking abstinence, but evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is lacking.

Methods:
This was a pragmatic RCT in Hong Kong, China, to compare the effectiveness of communicating smoking-related COVID-19 risk with generic cessation support on abstinence. Both groups received brief cessation advice at baseline. The intervention group received messaging on smoking-related COVID-19 risk and cessation support via instant messaging for three months (16 messages in total), which highlighted the increased risk of severe COVID-19 and deaths, and potentially higher risk of viral exposure (e.g. due to mask removal) for smokers. The control group received generic text messaging support for three months (16 messages). The primary outcomes were biochemically validated 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at 3 and 6 months. Intention to treat analyses was used.

Results:
Between 13 June and 30 October 2020, 1166 participants were randomly assigned to an intervention (n=583) or control (n=583) group. By intention-totreat, validated 7-day PPA did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups at three months (9.6% and 11.8%, relative risk, RR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.58–1.13, p=0.22) or six months (9.3% and 11.7%, RR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.57–1.11, p=0.18). A higher perceived severity of COVID-19 in smokers at baseline was associated with a greater validated 7-day PPA at six months, and a marginally significant intervention effect on changes in perceived severity from baseline through 6 months was found (p for group × time interaction = 0.08).

Conclusions:
Communicating smoking-related COVID-19 risk via instant messaging was not more effective in increasing smoking abstinence than generic cessation support.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329041
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.163
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.835

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeng, X-
dc.contributor.authorLuk, TT-
dc.contributor.authorWu, YS-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, SZ-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, DYT-
dc.contributor.authorTong, HSC-
dc.contributor.authorLai, VWY-
dc.contributor.authorLam, TH-
dc.contributor.authorWang, MP-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-05T07:54:50Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-05T07:54:50Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-14-
dc.identifier.citationTobacco Induced Diseases, 2023, v. 21-
dc.identifier.issn1617-9625-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329041-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Introduction:</strong><br>Observational and experimental studies have suggested that messaging on smoking-related COVID-19 risk may promote smoking abstinence, but evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is lacking.<br><br><strong>Methods:</strong><br>This was a pragmatic RCT in Hong Kong, China, to compare the effectiveness of communicating smoking-related COVID-19 risk with generic cessation support on abstinence. Both groups received brief cessation advice at baseline. The intervention group received messaging on smoking-related COVID-19 risk and cessation support via instant messaging for three months (16 messages in total), which highlighted the increased risk of severe COVID-19 and deaths, and potentially higher risk of viral exposure (e.g. due to mask removal) for smokers. The control group received generic text messaging support for three months (16 messages). The primary outcomes were biochemically validated 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at 3 and 6 months. Intention to treat analyses was used.<br><br><strong>Results:</strong><br>Between 13 June and 30 October 2020, 1166 participants were randomly assigned to an intervention (n=583) or control (n=583) group. By intention-totreat, validated 7-day PPA did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups at three months (9.6% and 11.8%, relative risk, RR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.58–1.13, p=0.22) or six months (9.3% and 11.7%, RR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.57–1.11, p=0.18). A higher perceived severity of COVID-19 in smokers at baseline was associated with a greater validated 7-day PPA at six months, and a marginally significant intervention effect on changes in perceived severity from baseline through 6 months was found (p for group × time interaction = 0.08).<br><br><strong>Conclusions:</strong><br>Communicating smoking-related COVID-19 risk via instant messaging was not more effective in increasing smoking abstinence than generic cessation support.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEU European Publishing-
dc.relation.ispartofTobacco Induced Diseases-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjecthealth communication-
dc.subjectmobile health-
dc.subjectsmoking cessation-
dc.titleEffect of smoking-related COVID-19 risk messaging on smoking cessation in community smokers: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.18332/tid/163176-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85164275118-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.eissn1617-9625-
dc.identifier.issnl1617-9625-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats