File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: The Cooperation Mechanism and Legal Harmonisation

TitleThe Cooperation Mechanism and Legal Harmonisation
Other TitlesAnalysing the Past, Present and Future of Mutual Recognition and Assistance in Insolvency Proceedings Across Mainland China and Hong Kong, with Insights from EU Insolvency Regulations
Authors
Keywordsconflict of laws
Cooperation Mechanism
Hong Kong-China cross-border insolvency
judicial cooperation
private international law
recognition and assistance
Issue Date26-May-2023
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2023, v. 22, n. 2, p. 971-1015 How to Cite?
Abstract

This article examines the potential and challenges of the ‘Cooperation Mechanism’, a scheme introduced jointly by the Supreme People’s Court in China and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region on 14 May 2021, for enhancing mutual recognition and assistance in insolvency proceedings. This article contends that the Cooperation Mechanism does not in itself constitute a formal mechanism for mutual recognition. To assess the impact of the Cooperation Mechanism, this article traces and analyses court decisions on recognition and assistance made before the implementation of the Cooperation Mechanism, and places them in contrast to those pursuant to or influenced by the Cooperation Mechanism. Additionally, it highlights a similar practice between Europe’s Brussels Convention of 1968 and two arrangements between Hong Kong and China prior to the Cooperation Mechanism, namely the 2006 Arrangement and the 2019 Arrangement, in carving out bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings, notwithstanding some technical differences.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331278
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.093
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.248

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Emily Hsiang-Hui-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T06:54:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-21T06:54:17Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-26-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Corporate Law Studies, 2023, v. 22, n. 2, p. 971-1015-
dc.identifier.issn1473-5970-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331278-
dc.description.abstract<p>This article examines the potential and challenges of the ‘Cooperation Mechanism’, a scheme introduced jointly by the Supreme People’s Court in China and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region on 14 May 2021, for enhancing mutual recognition and assistance in insolvency proceedings. This article contends that the Cooperation Mechanism does not in itself constitute a formal mechanism for mutual recognition. To assess the impact of the Cooperation Mechanism, this article traces and analyses court decisions on recognition and assistance made before the implementation of the Cooperation Mechanism, and places them in contrast to those pursuant to or influenced by the Cooperation Mechanism. Additionally, it highlights a similar practice between Europe’s Brussels Convention of 1968 and two arrangements between Hong Kong and China prior to the Cooperation Mechanism, namely the 2006 Arrangement and the 2019 Arrangement, in carving out bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings, notwithstanding some technical differences.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Corporate Law Studies-
dc.subjectconflict of laws-
dc.subjectCooperation Mechanism-
dc.subjectHong Kong-China cross-border insolvency-
dc.subjectjudicial cooperation-
dc.subjectprivate international law-
dc.subjectrecognition and assistance-
dc.titleThe Cooperation Mechanism and Legal Harmonisation-
dc.title.alternativeAnalysing the Past, Present and Future of Mutual Recognition and Assistance in Insolvency Proceedings Across Mainland China and Hong Kong, with Insights from EU Insolvency Regulations-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14735970.2023.2212451-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85160732584-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage971-
dc.identifier.epage1015-
dc.identifier.eissn1757-8426-
dc.identifier.issnl1473-5970-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats