File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: How to Complicate a Simple Case: The Judgment on the Merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya)

TitleHow to Complicate a Simple Case: The Judgment on the Merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya)
Authors
Keywordsacquiescence
continental shelf
cut-off effect
exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
International Court of Justice (ICJ)
maritime boundary
maritime delimitation
Issue Date2022
Citation
International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 2022, v. 37, n. 2, p. 350-357 How to Cite?
AbstractOn 12 October 2021, the International Court of Justice (ICJ or Court) issued its judgment on the merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya). The judgment raises questions of significance in respect of two issues upon which this comment elaborates. First, the Court failed to distinguish adequately between the notions of acquiescence and tacit agreement, which were at the basis of Kenya's claim for an agreed boundary running along a parallel of latitude. Second, in drawing the boundary as requested by Somalia, the Court departed from its usual approach concerning the adjustment of the provisional equidistance line established in the first stage of its three-stage delimitation process.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/334828
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.393
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.339

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLando, Massimo-
dc.contributor.authorJoly Hébert, Jessica-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T06:51:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-20T06:51:02Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 2022, v. 37, n. 2, p. 350-357-
dc.identifier.issn0927-3522-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/334828-
dc.description.abstractOn 12 October 2021, the International Court of Justice (ICJ or Court) issued its judgment on the merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya). The judgment raises questions of significance in respect of two issues upon which this comment elaborates. First, the Court failed to distinguish adequately between the notions of acquiescence and tacit agreement, which were at the basis of Kenya's claim for an agreed boundary running along a parallel of latitude. Second, in drawing the boundary as requested by Somalia, the Court departed from its usual approach concerning the adjustment of the provisional equidistance line established in the first stage of its three-stage delimitation process.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Marine and Coastal Law-
dc.subjectacquiescence-
dc.subjectcontinental shelf-
dc.subjectcut-off effect-
dc.subjectexclusive economic zone (EEZ)-
dc.subjectInternational Court of Justice (ICJ)-
dc.subjectmaritime boundary-
dc.subjectmaritime delimitation-
dc.titleHow to Complicate a Simple Case: The Judgment on the Merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/15718085-bja10094-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85128910931-
dc.identifier.volume37-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage350-
dc.identifier.epage357-
dc.identifier.eissn1571-8085-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats