File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Two-Stage Submodular Optimization of Dynamic Thermal Rating for Risk Mitigation Considering Placement and Operation Schedule

TitleTwo-Stage Submodular Optimization of Dynamic Thermal Rating for Risk Mitigation Considering Placement and Operation Schedule
Authors
KeywordsBraess paradox
cascading failure
combinatorial optimization
dynamic line rating
dynamic thermal rating
Heuristic algorithms
Markov processes
operation schedule
Optimization
Power system dynamics
Power system protection
Risk management
Risk mitigation
Schedules
sensor placement
service life
two-stage submodular optimization
Issue Date27-Jun-2023
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2023, p. 1-14 How to Cite?
Abstract

Cascading failure causes a major risk to society currently. And dynamic thermal rating (DTR) technique is a cost-effective approach to mitigate the risk by exploiting potential transmission capability. From the perspectives of service life and Braess paradox, it is important and challenging to jointly optimize the DTR placement and its operation schedule for changing system state, which is a two-stage combinatorial problem with only discrete variables, suffering from no approximation guarantee and dimension curse in traditional solving algorithms. Thus, the present work proposes a novel two-stage submodular optimization (TSSO) of DTR for risk mitigation considering placement and operation schedule. Specifically, it optimizes DTR placement with proper redundancy in first stage, and then determines the corresponding DTR operation for each system state in second stage. Under the condition of the Markov and submodular features in sub-function of risk mitigation, the submodularity of total objective function of TSSO can be proven for the first time. Based on this, a state-of-the-art efficient solving algorithm is developed that can provide a better approximation guarantee than previous studies by coordinating the separate curvature and error form. The performance of the proposed optimization model is verified by case results.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338409
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 7.326
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.312

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLong, Q-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, J-
dc.contributor.authorRen, C-
dc.contributor.authorYin, W-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, F-
dc.contributor.authorHou, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:28:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:28:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-27-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2023, p. 1-14-
dc.identifier.issn0885-8950-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338409-
dc.description.abstract<p>Cascading failure causes a major risk to society currently. And dynamic thermal rating (DTR) technique is a cost-effective approach to mitigate the risk by exploiting potential transmission capability. From the perspectives of service life and Braess paradox, it is important and challenging to jointly optimize the DTR placement and its operation schedule for changing system state, which is a two-stage combinatorial problem with only discrete variables, suffering from no approximation guarantee and dimension curse in traditional solving algorithms. Thus, the present work proposes a novel two-stage submodular optimization (TSSO) of DTR for risk mitigation considering placement and operation schedule. Specifically, it optimizes DTR placement with proper redundancy in first stage, and then determines the corresponding DTR operation for each system state in second stage. Under the condition of the Markov and submodular features in sub-function of risk mitigation, the submodularity of total objective function of TSSO can be proven for the first time. Based on this, a state-of-the-art efficient solving algorithm is developed that can provide a better approximation guarantee than previous studies by coordinating the separate curvature and error form. The performance of the proposed optimization model is verified by case results.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers-
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Power Systems-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBraess paradox-
dc.subjectcascading failure-
dc.subjectcombinatorial optimization-
dc.subjectdynamic line rating-
dc.subjectdynamic thermal rating-
dc.subjectHeuristic algorithms-
dc.subjectMarkov processes-
dc.subjectoperation schedule-
dc.subjectOptimization-
dc.subjectPower system dynamics-
dc.subjectPower system protection-
dc.subjectRisk management-
dc.subjectRisk mitigation-
dc.subjectSchedules-
dc.subjectsensor placement-
dc.subjectservice life-
dc.subjecttwo-stage submodular optimization-
dc.titleTwo-Stage Submodular Optimization of Dynamic Thermal Rating for Risk Mitigation Considering Placement and Operation Schedule-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TPWRS.2023.3290000-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85163788446-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage14-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-0679-
dc.identifier.issnl0885-8950-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats