File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England

TitleCould diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England
Authors
Keywordsdiabetes mellitus
health inequalities
prevention
primary health care
Issue Date23-Jun-2023
PublisherBritish Medical Association
Citation
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2023, v. 77, n. 9, p. 565-570 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (DPP) in England is a behavioural intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH). How this programme affects inequalities by age, sex, limiting illnesses or disability, ethnicity or deprivation is not known.

Methods We used multinomial and binary logistic regression models to compare whether the population with NDH at different stages of the programme are representative of the population with NDH: stages include (1) prevalence of NDH (using survey data from UK Household Longitudinal Study (n=794) and Health Survey for England (n=1383)); (2) identification in primary care and offer of programme (using administrative data from the National Diabetes Audit (n=1 267 350)) and (3) programme participation (using programme provider records (n=98 024)).

Results Predicted probabilities drawn from the regressions with demographics as each outcome and dataset identifier as predictors showed that younger adults (aged under 40) (4% of the population with NDH (95% CI 2.4% to 6.5%)) and older adults (aged 80 and above) (12% (95% CI 9.5% to 14.2%)) were slightly under-represented among programme participants (2% (95% CI 1.8% to 2.2%) and 8% (95% CI 7.8% to 8.2%) of programme participants, respectively). People living in deprived areas were under-represented in eight sessions (14% (95% CI 13.7% to 14.4%) vs 20% (95% CI 16.4% to 23.6%) in the general population). Ethnic minorities were over-represented among offers (35% (95% CI 35.1% to 35.6%) vs 13% (95% CI 9.1% to 16.4%) in general population), though the proportion dropped at the programme completion stage (19% (95% CI 18.5% to 19.5%)).

Conclusion The DPP has the potential to reduce ethnic inequalities, but may widen socioeconomic, age and limiting illness or disability-related inequalities in T2DM. While ethnic minority groups are over-represented at the identification and offer stages, efforts are required to support completion of the programme. Programme providers should target under-represented groups to ensure equitable access and narrow inequalities in T2DM.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339158
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 6.286
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.692
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChatzi, Georgia-
dc.contributor.authorWhittaker, William-
dc.contributor.authorChandola, Tarani-
dc.contributor.authorMason, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorSoiland-Reyes, Claudia-
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Matt-
dc.contributor.authorBower, Peter -
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:34:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:34:20Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-23-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2023, v. 77, n. 9, p. 565-570-
dc.identifier.issn0143-005X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339158-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background</strong> The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (DPP) in England is a behavioural intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH). How this programme affects inequalities by age, sex, limiting illnesses or disability, ethnicity or deprivation is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> We used multinomial and binary logistic regression models to compare whether the population with NDH at different stages of the programme are representative of the population with NDH: stages include (1) prevalence of NDH (using survey data from UK Household Longitudinal Study (n=794) and Health Survey for England (n=1383)); (2) identification in primary care and offer of programme (using administrative data from the National Diabetes Audit (n=1 267 350)) and (3) programme participation (using programme provider records (n=98 024)).</p><p><strong>Results</strong> Predicted probabilities drawn from the regressions with demographics as each outcome and dataset identifier as predictors showed that younger adults (aged under 40) (4% of the population with NDH (95% CI 2.4% to 6.5%)) and older adults (aged 80 and above) (12% (95% CI 9.5% to 14.2%)) were slightly under-represented among programme participants (2% (95% CI 1.8% to 2.2%) and 8% (95% CI 7.8% to 8.2%) of programme participants, respectively). People living in deprived areas were under-represented in eight sessions (14% (95% CI 13.7% to 14.4%) vs 20% (95% CI 16.4% to 23.6%) in the general population). Ethnic minorities were over-represented among offers (35% (95% CI 35.1% to 35.6%) vs 13% (95% CI 9.1% to 16.4%) in general population), though the proportion dropped at the programme completion stage (19% (95% CI 18.5% to 19.5%)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> The DPP has the potential to reduce ethnic inequalities, but may widen socioeconomic, age and limiting illness or disability-related inequalities in T2DM. While ethnic minority groups are over-represented at the identification and offer stages, efforts are required to support completion of the programme. Programme providers should target under-represented groups to ensure equitable access and narrow inequalities in T2DM.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBritish Medical Association-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitus-
dc.subjecthealth inequalities-
dc.subjectprevention-
dc.subjectprimary health care-
dc.titleCould diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jech-2022-219654-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85164409882-
dc.identifier.volume77-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage565-
dc.identifier.epage570-
dc.identifier.eissn1470-2738-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001020584200001-
dc.identifier.issnl0143-005X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats