File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: In situ digital testing method for quality assessment of soft soil improvement with polyurethane

TitleIn situ digital testing method for quality assessment of soft soil improvement with polyurethane
Authors
KeywordsConstant drilling speed
Drilling process monitoring system
Hydraulic rotary drilling process
Quality assessment
Soil improvement
Issue Date2-Aug-2023
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2023 How to Cite?
Abstract

This study purposes an in situ testing method on quality assessment of soil improvement. Factual drilling data includes the spatial distribution and in situ strength of untreated and treated soil along three different drillholes measured by on-site drilling monitoring method. These factual drilling data can characterize the degree of soil improvement by penetration injection with permeable polyurethane. Result from on-site drilling monitoring shows that the linear zones represent constant drilling speeds shown in the plot of drill bit advancement vs. net drilling time, which indicates the spatial distributions of soil profile. The soil profile at the study site is composed of four layers, which includes fill, untreated silty clay, treated silty clay, and mucky soil. The results of soil profile are verified by the parallel site loggings. The constant drilling speeds profile the coring-resistant strength of drilled soils. By comparing with the untreated silty clay, the constant drilling speeds of the treated silty clay have been decreased by 13.0–62.8%. Two drilling-speed-based indices of 61.2% and 65.6% are proposed to assess the decreased average drilling speed and the increased in situ strength of treated silty clay. Laboratory tests, i.e. uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) test, have been performed with core sample to investigate and characterize in situ strength by comparing that with drilling speeds. Results show that the average predicted strengths of treated silty clay are 2.4–6.9 times higher than the average measured strength of untreated silty clay. The UCS-based indices of 374.5% and 344.2% verified the quality assessment (QA) results by this new in situ method. This method provides a cost-effective tool for quality assessment of soil improvement by utilizing the digital drilling data.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340143
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.915
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.470

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, XF-
dc.contributor.authorWang, CJ-
dc.contributor.authorYue, WV-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, ZJ-
dc.contributor.authorYue, ZQ-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:41:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:41:58Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-02-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2023-
dc.identifier.issn1674-7755-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340143-
dc.description.abstract<p>This study purposes an <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/in-situ-testing" title="Learn more about in situ testing from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">in situ testing</a> method on quality assessment of soil improvement. Factual drilling data includes the spatial distribution and in <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/situ-strength" title="Learn more about situ strength from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">situ strength</a> of untreated and treated soil along three different drillholes measured by on-site drilling monitoring method. These factual drilling data can characterize the degree of soil improvement by penetration injection with permeable <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/polyurethan" title="Learn more about polyurethane from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">polyurethane</a>. Result from on-site drilling monitoring shows that the <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/linear-zone" title="Learn more about linear zones from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">linear zones</a> represent constant drilling speeds shown in the plot of drill bit advancement vs. net drilling time, which indicates the spatial distributions of soil profile. The soil profile at the study site is composed of four layers, which includes fill, untreated <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/silty-clay" title="Learn more about silty clay from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">silty clay</a>, treated silty clay, and mucky soil. The results of soil profile are verified by the parallel site loggings. The constant drilling speeds profile the coring-resistant strength of drilled soils. By comparing with the untreated silty clay, the constant drilling speeds of the treated silty clay have been decreased by 13.0–62.8%. Two drilling-speed-based indices of 61.2% and 65.6% are proposed to assess the decreased average drilling speed and the increased in situ strength of treated silty clay. Laboratory tests, i.e. uniaxial <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/compressive-strength" title="Learn more about compressive strength from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">compressive strength</a> (UCS) test, have been performed with core sample to investigate and characterize in situ strength by comparing that with drilling speeds. Results show that the average predicted strengths of treated silty clay are 2.4–6.9 times higher than the average measured strength of untreated silty clay. The UCS-based indices of 374.5% and 344.2% verified the quality assessment (QA) results by this new in situ method. This method provides a cost-effective tool for quality assessment of soil improvement by utilizing the digital drilling data.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering-
dc.subjectConstant drilling speed-
dc.subjectDrilling process monitoring system-
dc.subjectHydraulic rotary drilling process-
dc.subjectQuality assessment-
dc.subjectSoil improvement-
dc.titleIn situ digital testing method for quality assessment of soft soil improvement with polyurethane-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.07.002-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85170432231-
dc.identifier.eissn2589-0417-
dc.identifier.issnl1674-7755-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats