File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Post Living Donor Liver Transplantation Small-for-size Syndrome: Definitions, Timelines, Biochemical, and Clinical Factors for Diagnosis: Guidelines from the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

TitlePost Living Donor Liver Transplantation Small-for-size Syndrome: Definitions, Timelines, Biochemical, and Clinical Factors for Diagnosis: Guidelines from the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference
Authors
Issue Date2023
Citation
Transplantation, 2023, v. 107, n. 10, p. 2226-2237 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground. When a partial liver graft is unable to meet the demands of the recipient, a clinical phenomenon, small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), may ensue. Clear definition, diagnosis, and management are needed to optimize transplant outcomes. Methods. A Consensus Scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on specific aspects of SFSS, recommendations underwent blinded review by an independent panel, and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at the Consensus Conference. Results. The ideal graft-to-recipient weight ratio of ≥0.8% (or graft volume standard liver volume ratio of ≥40%) is recommended. It is also recommended to measure portal pressure or portal blood flow during living donor liver transplantation and maintain a postreperfusion portal pressure of <15 mm Hg and/or portal blood flow of <250 mL/min/100 g graft weight to optimize outcomes. The typical time point to diagnose SFSS is the postoperative day 7 to facilitate treatment and intervention. An objective 3-grade stratification of severity for protocolized management of SFSS is proposed. Conclusions. The proposed grading system based on clinical and biochemical factors will help clinicians in the early identification of patients at risk of developing SFSS and institute timely therapeutic measures. The validity of this newly created grading system should be evaluated in future prospective studies.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/342684
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.385
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.450

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKow, Alfred Wei Chieh-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jiang-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Madhukar S.-
dc.contributor.authorDe Martin, Eleonora-
dc.contributor.authorReddy, Mettu Srinivas-
dc.contributor.authorSoejima, Yuji-
dc.contributor.authorSyn, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Kymberly-
dc.contributor.authorXia, Qiang-
dc.contributor.authorSaraf, Neeraj-
dc.contributor.authorKamel, Refaat-
dc.contributor.authorNasralla, David-
dc.contributor.authorMcKenna, Greg-
dc.contributor.authorSrinvasan, Parthi-
dc.contributor.authorElsabbagh, Ahmed M.-
dc.contributor.authorPamecha, Vinayendra-
dc.contributor.authorPalaniappan, Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorMas, Valeria-
dc.contributor.authorTokat, Yaman-
dc.contributor.authorAsthana, Sonal-
dc.contributor.authorCherukuru, Ramkiran-
dc.contributor.authorEgawa, Hiroto-
dc.contributor.authorLerut, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorBroering, Dieter-
dc.contributor.authorBerenguer, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorCattral, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorClavien, Pierre Alain-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chao Long-
dc.contributor.authorShah, Samir-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Zhi Jun-
dc.contributor.authorEmond, Jean-
dc.contributor.authorAscher, Nancy-
dc.contributor.authorRammohan, Ashwin-
dc.contributor.authorBhangui, Prashant-
dc.contributor.authorRela, Mohamed-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong Sik-
dc.contributor.authorIkegami, Toru-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-17T07:05:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-17T07:05:31Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationTransplantation, 2023, v. 107, n. 10, p. 2226-2237-
dc.identifier.issn0041-1337-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/342684-
dc.description.abstractBackground. When a partial liver graft is unable to meet the demands of the recipient, a clinical phenomenon, small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), may ensue. Clear definition, diagnosis, and management are needed to optimize transplant outcomes. Methods. A Consensus Scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on specific aspects of SFSS, recommendations underwent blinded review by an independent panel, and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at the Consensus Conference. Results. The ideal graft-to-recipient weight ratio of ≥0.8% (or graft volume standard liver volume ratio of ≥40%) is recommended. It is also recommended to measure portal pressure or portal blood flow during living donor liver transplantation and maintain a postreperfusion portal pressure of <15 mm Hg and/or portal blood flow of <250 mL/min/100 g graft weight to optimize outcomes. The typical time point to diagnose SFSS is the postoperative day 7 to facilitate treatment and intervention. An objective 3-grade stratification of severity for protocolized management of SFSS is proposed. Conclusions. The proposed grading system based on clinical and biochemical factors will help clinicians in the early identification of patients at risk of developing SFSS and institute timely therapeutic measures. The validity of this newly created grading system should be evaluated in future prospective studies.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofTransplantation-
dc.titlePost Living Donor Liver Transplantation Small-for-size Syndrome: Definitions, Timelines, Biochemical, and Clinical Factors for Diagnosis: Guidelines from the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/TP.0000000000004770-
dc.identifier.pmid37749812-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85173884699-
dc.identifier.volume107-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage2226-
dc.identifier.epage2237-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats