File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Is danggui safe to be taken by breast cancer patients?-A skepticism finally answered by comprehensive preclinical evidence

TitleIs danggui safe to be taken by breast cancer patients?-A skepticism finally answered by comprehensive preclinical evidence
Authors
KeywordsAngelica sinensis
Breast cancer
Chinese herbal medicines
Estrogenic herbs
Primary breast cancer cells
Safety
Issue Date2019
Citation
Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2019, v. 10, n. JUN, article no. 706 How to Cite?
AbstractAngelica sinensis (AS, Danggui) has long been regarded to stimulate breast cancer growth; hence, the use of AS in breast cancer patients remains a major concern for both patients and practitioners. Since safety studies of herbs would be unethical to carry out in patients, the present study aimed to investigate the potential unsafe effects of AS in a systematic pre-clinical approach. Human breast cancer cells, breast orthotopic tumor-bearing mouse models, as well as primary breast cancer cells from patients' tumors were used to evaluate the effect of AS hot water extract on the progression of breast tumors and/or growth of breast cancer cells. We showed that AS is not that stimulatory in breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo, though AS should still be used with caution in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. This novel approach of applying breast cancer cell lines, xenograft, and syngeneic tumors models, as well as primary breast cancer cells from patients' tumors in Chinese medicines safety evaluation was proven feasible. Our finding is important information for patients, Chinese medicine practitioners, and clinicians on the safety use of AS in breast cancer, which will affect future clinical practice.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343284

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYue, Grace Gar Lee-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Lok Sze-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Hoi Wing-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Si-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, Julia Yuen Shan-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Zhi Xiu-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Bonita Ka Bo-
dc.contributor.authorMan-Kit Tse, Gary-
dc.contributor.authorBik-San Lau, Clara-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-10T09:06:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-10T09:06:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Pharmacology, 2019, v. 10, n. JUN, article no. 706-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343284-
dc.description.abstractAngelica sinensis (AS, Danggui) has long been regarded to stimulate breast cancer growth; hence, the use of AS in breast cancer patients remains a major concern for both patients and practitioners. Since safety studies of herbs would be unethical to carry out in patients, the present study aimed to investigate the potential unsafe effects of AS in a systematic pre-clinical approach. Human breast cancer cells, breast orthotopic tumor-bearing mouse models, as well as primary breast cancer cells from patients' tumors were used to evaluate the effect of AS hot water extract on the progression of breast tumors and/or growth of breast cancer cells. We showed that AS is not that stimulatory in breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo, though AS should still be used with caution in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. This novel approach of applying breast cancer cell lines, xenograft, and syngeneic tumors models, as well as primary breast cancer cells from patients' tumors in Chinese medicines safety evaluation was proven feasible. Our finding is important information for patients, Chinese medicine practitioners, and clinicians on the safety use of AS in breast cancer, which will affect future clinical practice.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Pharmacology-
dc.subjectAngelica sinensis-
dc.subjectBreast cancer-
dc.subjectChinese herbal medicines-
dc.subjectEstrogenic herbs-
dc.subjectPrimary breast cancer cells-
dc.subjectSafety-
dc.titleIs danggui safe to be taken by breast cancer patients?-A skepticism finally answered by comprehensive preclinical evidence-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphar.2019.00706-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85069509478-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issueJUN-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 706-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 706-
dc.identifier.eissn1663-9812-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats