File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A retrospective clinical evaluation of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures

TitleA retrospective clinical evaluation of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures
Authors
KeywordsLongevity
Resin-bonded fixed partial denture
Retrospective study
Issue Date2006
PublisherAmerican Dental Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://jada.ada.org
Citation
Journal Of The American Dental Association, 2006, v. 137 n. 6, p. 783-788 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground. The authors conducted a study to examine the clinical performance of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) that were inserted at The Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong. Methods. The authors recalled patients who had received two-unit cantilevered RBFPDs at least 24 months before the recall examination. The authors recorded the following data: patient's sex and age, operator's experience, prosthesis cementation date, endodontic treatment if performed, bone support, tooth mobility, the presence of shim-stock contacts on the abutment or pontic in intercuspal position, and the presence of aproximal axial contacts adjacent to the prosthesis. They also recorded the date of any debonding with subsequent treatment. They asked the patients qualitative questions about their prostheses. Results. A total of 269 prostheses were placed in 214 patients and had a mean service life of 51.7 months ± 19.5 months standard deviation, with a range of 13.2 to 141.6 months. Of 14 failed prostheses, 12 debonded, resulting in a success rate of 94.8 percent and clinical retention rate of 95.5 percent. No discernable rotation or drifting of the abutments was apparent in any of the prostheses. Overall patient satisfaction with RBFPDs was good, with an average assessment score of 8.5. Conclusions. The authors observed a 95.5 percent clinical retention rate of 269 two-unit RBFPDs, with no apparent drifting of the abutments. Longer-term follow-up studies are required. Clinical Implications. Two-unit RBFPDs are conservative and clinically retentive prostheses in the short to medium term.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66912
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.454
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.520
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBotelho, MGen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLeung, KCMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorNg, Hen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChan, Ken_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:50:23Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:50:23Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of The American Dental Association, 2006, v. 137 n. 6, p. 783-788en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0002-8177en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66912-
dc.description.abstractBackground. The authors conducted a study to examine the clinical performance of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) that were inserted at The Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong. Methods. The authors recalled patients who had received two-unit cantilevered RBFPDs at least 24 months before the recall examination. The authors recorded the following data: patient's sex and age, operator's experience, prosthesis cementation date, endodontic treatment if performed, bone support, tooth mobility, the presence of shim-stock contacts on the abutment or pontic in intercuspal position, and the presence of aproximal axial contacts adjacent to the prosthesis. They also recorded the date of any debonding with subsequent treatment. They asked the patients qualitative questions about their prostheses. Results. A total of 269 prostheses were placed in 214 patients and had a mean service life of 51.7 months ± 19.5 months standard deviation, with a range of 13.2 to 141.6 months. Of 14 failed prostheses, 12 debonded, resulting in a success rate of 94.8 percent and clinical retention rate of 95.5 percent. No discernable rotation or drifting of the abutments was apparent in any of the prostheses. Overall patient satisfaction with RBFPDs was good, with an average assessment score of 8.5. Conclusions. The authors observed a 95.5 percent clinical retention rate of 269 two-unit RBFPDs, with no apparent drifting of the abutments. Longer-term follow-up studies are required. Clinical Implications. Two-unit RBFPDs are conservative and clinically retentive prostheses in the short to medium term.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAmerican Dental Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://jada.ada.orgen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Dental Associationen_HK
dc.subjectLongevity-
dc.subjectResin-bonded fixed partial denture-
dc.subjectRetrospective study-
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_HK
dc.subject.meshAdulten_HK
dc.subject.meshAgeden_HK
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and overen_HK
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - classificationen_HK
dc.subject.meshCementationen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Abutmentsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration Failureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDenture Designen_HK
dc.subject.meshDenture Retentionen_HK
dc.subject.meshDenture, Partial, Fixed, Resin-Bondeden_HK
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_HK
dc.subject.meshPatient Satisfactionen_HK
dc.subject.meshPhosphatesen_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cementsen_HK
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshRoot Canal Therapyen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Mobility - classificationen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Preparation, Prosthodonticen_HK
dc.titleA retrospective clinical evaluation of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial denturesen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0002-8177&volume=137&issue=6&spage=783&epage=788&date=2006&atitle=A+retrospective+clinical+evaluation+of+two-unit+cantilevered+resin-bonded+fixed+partial+denturesen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBotelho, MG:botelho@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLeung, KCM:kcmleung@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBotelho, MG=rp00033en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, KCM=rp00032en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0290-
dc.identifier.pmid16803807-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33745755642en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros120019en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33745755642&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume137en_HK
dc.identifier.issue6en_HK
dc.identifier.spage783en_HK
dc.identifier.epage788en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000238329600019-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBotelho, MG=7005751169en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLeung, KCM=26221830300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNg, H=14033229500en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, K=7406035593en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0002-8177-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats