File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Management of peritoneal tear during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty

TitleManagement of peritoneal tear during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty
Authors
KeywordsHernia
Inguinal hernia
Inguinal herniorrhaphy
Laparoscopic technique
Laparoscopy
Issue Date2002
PublisherSpringer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00464/
Citation
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2002, v. 16 n. 10, p. 1474-1477 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Peritoneal tear during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) results in pneumoperitoneum and loss of extraperitoneal space. To avoid bowel adhesions, internal herniation, and mesh migration, closure of the peritoneal opening is preferred. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of various operative techniques for the closure of peritoneal laceration. Methods: Between April 2000 and May 2001, 100 consecutive patients undergoing 123 TEPs were recruited for the present study. The incidence of peritoneal tear and techniques for the closure of peritoneal opening were documented. Operative time and postoperative morbidity were compared among groups for which different closure methods of peritoneal laceration were used. Results: The incidence of peritoneal tear was 47%. The mean operative times of unilateral TEPs with and without peritoneal laceration were 66 min and 53 min, respectively (p<0.05). Techniques for the closure of the peritoneal opening included endoscopic stapling (n = 12), endoscopic suturing (n = 14), and pretied suture loop ligation (n = 21). The mean operative times for unilateral TEPs with endoscopic stapling, pretied suture loop ligation, and endoscopic suturing of peritoneal tear were 53, 64, and 82 min, respectively (p<0.05). Comparison of postoperative morbidity showed no significant differences among the three groups. Conclusion: Peritoneal tear is a frequent and challenging intraoperative event during TEP. Its occurrence significantly prolongs the length of operation. Endoscopic stapling and pretied suture loop ligation are safe and quick techniques for the closure of peritoneal tear during TEP.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/83485
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.453
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.457
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLau, Hen_HK
dc.contributor.authorPatil, NGen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYuen, WKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Fen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T08:41:36Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T08:41:36Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_HK
dc.identifier.citationSurgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2002, v. 16 n. 10, p. 1474-1477en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/83485-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Peritoneal tear during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) results in pneumoperitoneum and loss of extraperitoneal space. To avoid bowel adhesions, internal herniation, and mesh migration, closure of the peritoneal opening is preferred. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of various operative techniques for the closure of peritoneal laceration. Methods: Between April 2000 and May 2001, 100 consecutive patients undergoing 123 TEPs were recruited for the present study. The incidence of peritoneal tear and techniques for the closure of peritoneal opening were documented. Operative time and postoperative morbidity were compared among groups for which different closure methods of peritoneal laceration were used. Results: The incidence of peritoneal tear was 47%. The mean operative times of unilateral TEPs with and without peritoneal laceration were 66 min and 53 min, respectively (p<0.05). Techniques for the closure of the peritoneal opening included endoscopic stapling (n = 12), endoscopic suturing (n = 14), and pretied suture loop ligation (n = 21). The mean operative times for unilateral TEPs with endoscopic stapling, pretied suture loop ligation, and endoscopic suturing of peritoneal tear were 53, 64, and 82 min, respectively (p<0.05). Comparison of postoperative morbidity showed no significant differences among the three groups. Conclusion: Peritoneal tear is a frequent and challenging intraoperative event during TEP. Its occurrence significantly prolongs the length of operation. Endoscopic stapling and pretied suture loop ligation are safe and quick techniques for the closure of peritoneal tear during TEP.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00464/en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniquesen_HK
dc.subjectHerniaen_HK
dc.subjectInguinal herniaen_HK
dc.subjectInguinal herniorrhaphyen_HK
dc.subjectLaparoscopic techniqueen_HK
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_HK
dc.titleManagement of peritoneal tear during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplastyen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0930-2794&volume=16 &issue=Suppl 1&spage=S311&epage=&date=2002&atitle=Management+of+peritoneal+tear+during+endoscopic+extraperitoneal+inguinal+hernioplastyen_HK
dc.identifier.emailPatil, NG: ngpatil@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityPatil, NG=rp00388en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-001-8299-zen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid12072988-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036790981en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros70571en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros76938-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036790981&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume16en_HK
dc.identifier.issue10en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1474en_HK
dc.identifier.epage1477en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000178413000017-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLau, H=7201497812en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPatil, NG=7103152514en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYuen, WK=7102761292en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLee, F=7403111996en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0930-2794-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats