File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Dissociating the effects of viewpoint disparity and image similarity in mental rotation and object recognition.

TitleDissociating the effects of viewpoint disparity and image similarity in mental rotation and object recognition.
Authors
Issue Date2008
PublisherVision Sciences Society
Citation
Vision Sciences Society 8th Annual Meeting, Naples, FL, 9-14 May 2008, p. 215 Abstract no. 52.23 How to Cite?
AbstractMental rotation (MR) is often measured in a task where participants judge the handedness of rotated objects, and is revealed by a viewpoint cost - a linear reduction in performance with an increase of viewpoint disparity for the objects. Similar viewpoint costs are also often found for object recognition (OR), in tasks where participants match the identity of rotated objects. These findings led to speculations that MR might be the mechanism underlying OR. However, recent studies dissociate the two tasks (Gauthier et al., 2002; Hayward et al., 2006). If viewpoint costs are dissociable in MR and OR, we may ask whether they arise because of the same or different factors. Specifically, viewpoint disparity is usually confounded by image similarity in these tasks - images become dissimilar with an increase in viewpoint difference. Here, we investigated the effects of viewpoint disparity and image similarity in MR and OR using novel objects rotated around the vertical axis. Subjective similarity ratings for image pairs that differed by 40˚, 80˚, 120˚ and 160˚ were collected and used to dissociate the two factors. In a Similarity condition, the viewpoint disparity was fixed and image similarity was manipulated. In a Viewpoint condition, viewpoint disparities were manipulated while similarity was fixed. In a sequential matching paradigm, participants performed the MR or OR tasks in both Similarity and Viewpoint conditions. Performance was better for similar than dissimilar image pairs for both tasks, but the effect was larger for OR than MR. In contrast, when similarity was controlled, a viewpoint cost was only found for MR but not for OR. These results demonstrate different causes of the viewpoint costs in the two tasks: while MR largely relies on 3-D mental transformation procedures that depend on viewpoint disparity, OR is based predominantly on matching similarity of image features. Acknowledgement: This work was supported by grants from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (China), NSF and the James S. McDonnell Foundation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/110023

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Oen_HK
dc.contributor.authorHayward, WGen_HK
dc.contributor.authorGauthier, Ien_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-26T01:47:50Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-26T01:47:50Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_HK
dc.identifier.citationVision Sciences Society 8th Annual Meeting, Naples, FL, 9-14 May 2008, p. 215 Abstract no. 52.23-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/110023-
dc.description.abstractMental rotation (MR) is often measured in a task where participants judge the handedness of rotated objects, and is revealed by a viewpoint cost - a linear reduction in performance with an increase of viewpoint disparity for the objects. Similar viewpoint costs are also often found for object recognition (OR), in tasks where participants match the identity of rotated objects. These findings led to speculations that MR might be the mechanism underlying OR. However, recent studies dissociate the two tasks (Gauthier et al., 2002; Hayward et al., 2006). If viewpoint costs are dissociable in MR and OR, we may ask whether they arise because of the same or different factors. Specifically, viewpoint disparity is usually confounded by image similarity in these tasks - images become dissimilar with an increase in viewpoint difference. Here, we investigated the effects of viewpoint disparity and image similarity in MR and OR using novel objects rotated around the vertical axis. Subjective similarity ratings for image pairs that differed by 40˚, 80˚, 120˚ and 160˚ were collected and used to dissociate the two factors. In a Similarity condition, the viewpoint disparity was fixed and image similarity was manipulated. In a Viewpoint condition, viewpoint disparities were manipulated while similarity was fixed. In a sequential matching paradigm, participants performed the MR or OR tasks in both Similarity and Viewpoint conditions. Performance was better for similar than dissimilar image pairs for both tasks, but the effect was larger for OR than MR. In contrast, when similarity was controlled, a viewpoint cost was only found for MR but not for OR. These results demonstrate different causes of the viewpoint costs in the two tasks: while MR largely relies on 3-D mental transformation procedures that depend on viewpoint disparity, OR is based predominantly on matching similarity of image features. Acknowledgement: This work was supported by grants from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (China), NSF and the James S. McDonnell Foundation.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherVision Sciences Society-
dc.relation.ispartofVision Sciences Society Annual Meeting, VSS 2008en_HK
dc.titleDissociating the effects of viewpoint disparity and image similarity in mental rotation and object recognition.en_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailHayward, WG: whayward@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityHayward, WG=rp00630en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros145170en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats