File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00268-012-1522-3
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84864285237
- PMID: 22411084
- WOS: WOS:000304880600024
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Role of portal vein embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma management and its effect on recurrence: A case-control study
Title | Role of portal vein embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma management and its effect on recurrence: A case-control study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Medicine & Public Health Surgery Abdominal Surgery Cardiac Surgery General Surgery Thoracic Surgery Vascular Surgery |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Springer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00268/ |
Citation | World Journal Of Surgery, 2012, v. 36 n. 7, p. 1640-1646 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background Liver regeneration that occurs after portal vein embolization (PVE) may have adverse effects on the microscopic tumor foci in the residual liver mass in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Fifty-four HCC patients with inadequate functional residual liver volume were offered PVE during a seven-year period. Among them, 34 (63%) patients underwent curative resection. They were compared with a matched control group (n = 102) who underwent surgery without PVE. Postoperative complications, pattern of recurrence, and survival were compared between groups. Results In the PVE group, a pre-embolization functional residual liver volume of 23% (12-33.5%) improved to 34% (20-54%) (p = 0.005) at the time of surgery. When the two groups were compared, minor (PVE, 24%; control, 29%; p = 0.651) and major (PVE, 18%; control, 15%; p = 0.784) complications were similar. After a follow-up period of 35 months (standard deviation 25 months), extrahepatic recurrences were detected in 10 PVE patients (29%) and 41 control patients (40%) (p = 0.310). Intrahepatic recurrences were seen in 10 (29%) and 47 (46%) cases (p = 0.109) in the PVE and control groups, respectively. In the PVE group, 41% (n = 14) of the recurrences were detected before one year, compared with 42% (n = 43) in the control group (p = 1). Disease-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 57, 29, and 26% in the control group and 60, 42, and 42% in the PVE group (log-rank, p = 0.335). On multivariate analysis, PVE was not a factor affecting survival (p = 0.821). Conclusions Portal vein embolization increases the resectability of initially unresectable HCC due to inadequate functional residual liver volume, and it has no deleterious oncological effect after major resection of HCC. © The Author(s) 2012. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/147108 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.772 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Siriwardana, RC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lo, CM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, SC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Fan, ST | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-28T08:17:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-05-28T08:17:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | World Journal Of Surgery, 2012, v. 36 n. 7, p. 1640-1646 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0364-2313 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/147108 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Liver regeneration that occurs after portal vein embolization (PVE) may have adverse effects on the microscopic tumor foci in the residual liver mass in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Fifty-four HCC patients with inadequate functional residual liver volume were offered PVE during a seven-year period. Among them, 34 (63%) patients underwent curative resection. They were compared with a matched control group (n = 102) who underwent surgery without PVE. Postoperative complications, pattern of recurrence, and survival were compared between groups. Results In the PVE group, a pre-embolization functional residual liver volume of 23% (12-33.5%) improved to 34% (20-54%) (p = 0.005) at the time of surgery. When the two groups were compared, minor (PVE, 24%; control, 29%; p = 0.651) and major (PVE, 18%; control, 15%; p = 0.784) complications were similar. After a follow-up period of 35 months (standard deviation 25 months), extrahepatic recurrences were detected in 10 PVE patients (29%) and 41 control patients (40%) (p = 0.310). Intrahepatic recurrences were seen in 10 (29%) and 47 (46%) cases (p = 0.109) in the PVE and control groups, respectively. In the PVE group, 41% (n = 14) of the recurrences were detected before one year, compared with 42% (n = 43) in the control group (p = 1). Disease-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 57, 29, and 26% in the control group and 60, 42, and 42% in the PVE group (log-rank, p = 0.335). On multivariate analysis, PVE was not a factor affecting survival (p = 0.821). Conclusions Portal vein embolization increases the resectability of initially unresectable HCC due to inadequate functional residual liver volume, and it has no deleterious oncological effect after major resection of HCC. © The Author(s) 2012. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00268/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | World Journal of Surgery | en_HK |
dc.rights | The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine & Public Health | en_US |
dc.subject | Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Abdominal Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Cardiac Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | General Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Thoracic Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Vascular Surgery | en_US |
dc.title | Role of portal vein embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma management and its effect on recurrence: A case-control study | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://www.springerlink.com/link-out/?id=2104&code=VR240Q5X780Q3165&MUD=MP | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lo, CM: chungmlo@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Fan, ST: stfan@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lo, CM=rp00412 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Fan, ST=rp00355 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00268-012-1522-3 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22411084 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84864285237 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 211075 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84864285237&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 36 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 1640 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 1646 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1432-2323 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000304880600024 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.description.other | Springer Open Choice, 28 May 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Siriwardana, RC=35321203400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lo, CM=7401771672 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, SC=36901164300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fan, ST=7402678224 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 10480226 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0364-2313 | - |