File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Time used in endodontic treatment with or without magnifying loupes

TitleTime used in endodontic treatment with or without magnifying loupes
Authors
KeywordsClinical trials
Endodontics and Loupe
Time
Issue Date2012
PublisherIADR.
Citation
The 90th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR, Iguaçu Falls, Brazil, 20-23 June 2012 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To compare the time in performing endodontic treatment with or without the use of magnifying loupes. Method: Patients who required primary endodontic treatment (Root Canal Treatment or RCT) in two clinical trial centres namely University Health Service of The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (HKU) and the Department of Special Dentistry, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University in Beijing (PKU) were invited to participate in this study. The study was approved by the Independent Review Boards in HKU and in PKU. Three dentists from HKU and three dentists from PKU, forming three pairs of dentists with similar years of clinical experience, carried out the endodontic treatments. One dentist from each pair was trained to use magnifying loupes (2.5X). All six dentists performed RCT according to the same protocol and procedures, and used the same materials, either in a single or in multiple visits. The total treatment time was recorded for each treated tooth. Results: Totally 125 PKU patients, aged 43.8±16.1, and 114 HKU patients, aged 44.8±16.1, were recruited. There were 44 teeth with one canal and 81 teeth with multiple canals treated in PKU; and 51 teeth with one canal and 63 teeth with multiple canals treated in HKU. The treatment time for RCT with and without loupes were 54.6±24.1 min (N=140) and 64.0±41.4 min (N=99) (p=0.045). The treatment time used for RCT on single-canal teeth with and without loupes were 37.6±15.8 min (N=44) and 39.5±21.0 min (N=51); respectively (p=0.609). The treatment time used on multiple-canal teeth with and without loupes were 62.4±23.3 min (N=96) and 90.0±42.0 min (N=48) respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: Endodontic treatment time was significantly reduced with the use of magnifying loupes on multiple-canal teeth but not on single-canal teeth.
DescriptionDental Materials 4: Clinical Trials 156 - Clinical Trials (Poster Session): no. 1386
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/152986

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, AWYen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Xen_US
dc.contributor.authorYin, Xen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorChu, CHen_US
dc.contributor.authorLo, ECMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-16T09:54:08Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-16T09:54:08Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 90th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR, Iguaçu Falls, Brazil, 20-23 June 2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/152986-
dc.descriptionDental Materials 4: Clinical Trials 156 - Clinical Trials (Poster Session): no. 1386-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the time in performing endodontic treatment with or without the use of magnifying loupes. Method: Patients who required primary endodontic treatment (Root Canal Treatment or RCT) in two clinical trial centres namely University Health Service of The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (HKU) and the Department of Special Dentistry, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University in Beijing (PKU) were invited to participate in this study. The study was approved by the Independent Review Boards in HKU and in PKU. Three dentists from HKU and three dentists from PKU, forming three pairs of dentists with similar years of clinical experience, carried out the endodontic treatments. One dentist from each pair was trained to use magnifying loupes (2.5X). All six dentists performed RCT according to the same protocol and procedures, and used the same materials, either in a single or in multiple visits. The total treatment time was recorded for each treated tooth. Results: Totally 125 PKU patients, aged 43.8±16.1, and 114 HKU patients, aged 44.8±16.1, were recruited. There were 44 teeth with one canal and 81 teeth with multiple canals treated in PKU; and 51 teeth with one canal and 63 teeth with multiple canals treated in HKU. The treatment time for RCT with and without loupes were 54.6±24.1 min (N=140) and 64.0±41.4 min (N=99) (p=0.045). The treatment time used for RCT on single-canal teeth with and without loupes were 37.6±15.8 min (N=44) and 39.5±21.0 min (N=51); respectively (p=0.609). The treatment time used on multiple-canal teeth with and without loupes were 62.4±23.3 min (N=96) and 90.0±42.0 min (N=48) respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: Endodontic treatment time was significantly reduced with the use of magnifying loupes on multiple-canal teeth but not on single-canal teeth.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherIADR.-
dc.relation.ispartofIADR 90th General Session & Exhibitionen_US
dc.subjectClinical trials-
dc.subjectEndodontics and Loupe-
dc.subjectTime-
dc.titleTime used in endodontic treatment with or without magnifying loupesen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailZhang, C: zhangcf@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailChu, CH: chchu@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailLo, ECM: hrdplcm@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityZhang, C=rp01408en_US
dc.identifier.authorityChu, CH=rp00022en_US
dc.identifier.authorityLo, ECM=rp00015en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros200534en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats