File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Conference Paper: Vibratory and perceptual measurement of resonant voice

TitleVibratory and perceptual measurement of resonant voice
Authors
Issue Date2012
Citation
The 41st Annual Symposium of The Voice Foundation (vf 2012), Philadelphia, PA., 30 May-3 June 2012. How to Cite?
AbstractINTRODUCTION: Resonant voice is a commonly used vocal facilitative technique for treating individuals with phonotraumatic injuries. Traditionally, auditory perceptual evaluation is used to judge the degree of resonance during resonant voice production. The present study investigated whether there existed a correlation between auditory perceptual rating of resonant voice and the physical vibration in the facial bone. It also compared the magnitude of facial bone vibration in three types of voice production (resonant versus non-resonant versus strained voices). METHOD: Thirty-six vocally healthy individuals were given a session of resonant voice training. Piezoelectric accelerometers were used to measure the vibrations over the nasal bridge and in the peri-laryngeal area during resonant voice production. Seventy-two sounds (/ma/) under resonant voice condition by these speakers were selected and rated by two experienced speech pathologists to evaluate the amount of phonatory resonance using an 11-point equal appearing interval scale. The magnitude of facial bone vibration among the three voice types was compared as well. RESULTS: Results indicated significant moderate correlation between the nasal bone vibration and the auditory perceptual rating of phonatory resonance (Spearman rho=0.6, p<0.0001). Compare to the non-resonant and strained voice, resonant voice has a significant increase (p<0.05) in the magnitude of facial bone vibration. DISCUSSION: These results suggested that piezoelectric accelerometer can be used as a noninvasive tool to quantitatively and reliably measure the extent of bone vibration during resonant voice production. It is more useful than the auditory perceptual rating per se in determining the extent of resonance.
DescriptionTheme: Care of the Professional Voice
Speech-Language Pathology Session 2B: abstract no. SLP53
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153225

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorMa, EPMen_US
dc.contributor.authorYiu, EMLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-16T10:00:35Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-16T10:00:35Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 41st Annual Symposium of The Voice Foundation (vf 2012), Philadelphia, PA., 30 May-3 June 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153225-
dc.descriptionTheme: Care of the Professional Voice-
dc.descriptionSpeech-Language Pathology Session 2B: abstract no. SLP53-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Resonant voice is a commonly used vocal facilitative technique for treating individuals with phonotraumatic injuries. Traditionally, auditory perceptual evaluation is used to judge the degree of resonance during resonant voice production. The present study investigated whether there existed a correlation between auditory perceptual rating of resonant voice and the physical vibration in the facial bone. It also compared the magnitude of facial bone vibration in three types of voice production (resonant versus non-resonant versus strained voices). METHOD: Thirty-six vocally healthy individuals were given a session of resonant voice training. Piezoelectric accelerometers were used to measure the vibrations over the nasal bridge and in the peri-laryngeal area during resonant voice production. Seventy-two sounds (/ma/) under resonant voice condition by these speakers were selected and rated by two experienced speech pathologists to evaluate the amount of phonatory resonance using an 11-point equal appearing interval scale. The magnitude of facial bone vibration among the three voice types was compared as well. RESULTS: Results indicated significant moderate correlation between the nasal bone vibration and the auditory perceptual rating of phonatory resonance (Spearman rho=0.6, p<0.0001). Compare to the non-resonant and strained voice, resonant voice has a significant increase (p<0.05) in the magnitude of facial bone vibration. DISCUSSION: These results suggested that piezoelectric accelerometer can be used as a noninvasive tool to quantitatively and reliably measure the extent of bone vibration during resonant voice production. It is more useful than the auditory perceptual rating per se in determining the extent of resonance.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Symposium of the Voice Foundation, vf 2012en_US
dc.titleVibratory and perceptual measurement of resonant voiceen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailMa, EPM: estella.ma@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailYiu, EML: eyiu@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityMa, EPM=rp00933en_US
dc.identifier.authorityYiu, EML=rp00981en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros201303en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats