File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Acoustic features of radio performers’ voices
Title | Acoustic features of radio performers’ voices |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Citation | The 41st Annual Symposium of the Voice Foundation, Philadelphia, PA., 30 May-3 June 2012. How to Cite? |
Abstract | INTRODUCTION: The acoustic features of supranormal (better-than-normal) vocal performers e.g. actors and singers are well-documented (e.g. Barrichelo et al, 2001; Bele, 2006). Measures such as alpha ratio, speaker’s/singer’s formant and fundamental frequency have been useful in quantifying these voices and differentiating them from non-performing controls. Radio professionals are a subgroup of supranormal vocal performers. This pilot study will explore the acoustic differences between radio performers and non-performing controls. METHOD: Male radio performers (n=15, mean age=36yrs including announcers, voice-over artists and newsreaders) and matched male controls with no history of voice disorder or professional vocal performance (n=15, mean age=36yrs) participated as pilot groups. Participants were recorded reading a standard passage in two conditions: 1) as if in conversation outside the sound booth (habitual) and 2) as if presenting on the radio (performance). Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) (Hillenbrand & Houde, 1996) and Alpha Ratio (AR) (Sundberg & Nordenberg, 2006) were calculated for each voice sample. Factorial group x condition ANOVAS were conducted for CPP and AR. RESULTS: There were no significant interactions between group and condition for CPP or AR and no main group effects for both measures. There was a main effect for condition (p=0.021, p=0.002) seen for both measures across both groups. DISCUSSION: There were no differences between voices of radio performers and controls for CPP and AR. Differences between conditions may be due to a practice effect. These results contrast with our preliminary auditory-perceptual analysis and other previous studies (Medrado et al, 2005) where voices of radio performers were easily identified from controls. Continued data collection/analysis will examine specific characteristics of radio performer sub-types e.g. voice-over artists vs newsreaders as well as measures of Long Term Average Spectrum, fundamental frequency and detailed perceptual analysis. |
Description | Theme: Care of the Professional Voice Speech-Language Pathology Session 2A: abstract no. SLP50 |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/153226 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wurhurst, S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Madill, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | McCabe, P | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yiu, EML | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Heard, R | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-16T10:00:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-16T10:00:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | The 41st Annual Symposium of the Voice Foundation, Philadelphia, PA., 30 May-3 June 2012. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/153226 | - |
dc.description | Theme: Care of the Professional Voice | - |
dc.description | Speech-Language Pathology Session 2A: abstract no. SLP50 | - |
dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: The acoustic features of supranormal (better-than-normal) vocal performers e.g. actors and singers are well-documented (e.g. Barrichelo et al, 2001; Bele, 2006). Measures such as alpha ratio, speaker’s/singer’s formant and fundamental frequency have been useful in quantifying these voices and differentiating them from non-performing controls. Radio professionals are a subgroup of supranormal vocal performers. This pilot study will explore the acoustic differences between radio performers and non-performing controls. METHOD: Male radio performers (n=15, mean age=36yrs including announcers, voice-over artists and newsreaders) and matched male controls with no history of voice disorder or professional vocal performance (n=15, mean age=36yrs) participated as pilot groups. Participants were recorded reading a standard passage in two conditions: 1) as if in conversation outside the sound booth (habitual) and 2) as if presenting on the radio (performance). Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) (Hillenbrand & Houde, 1996) and Alpha Ratio (AR) (Sundberg & Nordenberg, 2006) were calculated for each voice sample. Factorial group x condition ANOVAS were conducted for CPP and AR. RESULTS: There were no significant interactions between group and condition for CPP or AR and no main group effects for both measures. There was a main effect for condition (p=0.021, p=0.002) seen for both measures across both groups. DISCUSSION: There were no differences between voices of radio performers and controls for CPP and AR. Differences between conditions may be due to a practice effect. These results contrast with our preliminary auditory-perceptual analysis and other previous studies (Medrado et al, 2005) where voices of radio performers were easily identified from controls. Continued data collection/analysis will examine specific characteristics of radio performer sub-types e.g. voice-over artists vs newsreaders as well as measures of Long Term Average Spectrum, fundamental frequency and detailed perceptual analysis. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Annual Symposium of the Voice Foundation, vf 2012 | en_US |
dc.title | Acoustic features of radio performers’ voices | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Madill, C: cate.madill@sydney.edu.au | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Yiu, EML: eyiu@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Yiu, EML=rp00981 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 201304 | en_US |
dc.customcontrol.immutable | sml 130320 | - |