File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Repetition blindness for words and pictures

TitleRepetition blindness for words and pictures
Authors
Issue Date2010
PublisherAustralian Psychological Society.
Citation
The 37th Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference, Melbourne , Australia, 17-19 April 2010, p. 3 How to Cite?
AbstractRepetition blindness (RB) refers to people‘s tendency to omit the second occurrence of a repeated item when recalling lists of briefly presented stimuli. RB has been reported for a variety of stimuli including both words and pictures and has also been claimed to occur between pictures and words that refer to the same concept, suggesting that it taps a conceptual level of representation. This paper reports a series of experiments that compared RB for words and pictures to determine when and how processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli converge on this conceptual level. Separate investigations of RB using only word or picture stimuli revealed much stronger and more robust RB effects for words than pictures. However, an experiment including both stimulus formats showed stronger RB for repeated pictures than for repeated words or cross-format stimuli. The implications of the results for theories of RB and conceptual representation will be discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/224129
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, S-
dc.contributor.authorHarris, IM-
dc.contributor.authorHayward, WG-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-24T04:47:05Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-24T04:47:05Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationThe 37th Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference, Melbourne , Australia, 17-19 April 2010, p. 3-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-909881-42-9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/224129-
dc.description.abstractRepetition blindness (RB) refers to people‘s tendency to omit the second occurrence of a repeated item when recalling lists of briefly presented stimuli. RB has been reported for a variety of stimuli including both words and pictures and has also been claimed to occur between pictures and words that refer to the same concept, suggesting that it taps a conceptual level of representation. This paper reports a series of experiments that compared RB for words and pictures to determine when and how processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli converge on this conceptual level. Separate investigations of RB using only word or picture stimuli revealed much stronger and more robust RB effects for words than pictures. However, an experiment including both stimulus formats showed stronger RB for repeated pictures than for repeated words or cross-format stimuli. The implications of the results for theories of RB and conceptual representation will be discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAustralian Psychological Society.-
dc.relation.ispartofCombined Abstracts of 2010 Australian Psychology Conferences-
dc.rightsThis is an electronic version of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final version of the article as published in the print edition of the journal].-
dc.titleRepetition blindness for words and pictures-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailHayward, WG: whayward@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHayward, WG=rp00630-
dc.identifier.hkuros171186-
dc.identifier.spage3-
dc.identifier.epage3-
dc.publisher.placeMelbourne-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats