File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/13876988.2015.1095427
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84945302942
- WOS: WOS:000399351600004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Policy Advocacy in Transitioning Regimes: Comparative Lessons from the Case of Harbour Protection in Hong Kong
Title | Policy Advocacy in Transitioning Regimes: Comparative Lessons from the Case of Harbour Protection in Hong Kong |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | agenda setting comparative policy analysis mixed methods policy advocacy transitioning regimes |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Citation | Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, How to Cite? |
Abstract | Current research on policy advocacy relies exclusively on established regimes where instability is largely contained. Using the harbour protection advocacy in Hong Kong as an exploratory case, the article documents how conservationists exploited the unique opportunities arising from the transfer of sovereignty to advance heritage protection policy. Three new strategic choices in policy advocacy are identified. First, policy advocates strategically switched between issue frames instead of becoming strongly identified with any issue frame. Second, they avoided prolonged involvement by pursuing modest, programme-level adjustments. Third, they circumvented the restrictions on scope and focus by creating new venues outside of the policy subsystem. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/224902 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.043 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lam, WF | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, KN | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-18T03:33:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-18T03:33:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1387-6988 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/224902 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Current research on policy advocacy relies exclusively on established regimes where instability is largely contained. Using the harbour protection advocacy in Hong Kong as an exploratory case, the article documents how conservationists exploited the unique opportunities arising from the transfer of sovereignty to advance heritage protection policy. Three new strategic choices in policy advocacy are identified. First, policy advocates strategically switched between issue frames instead of becoming strongly identified with any issue frame. Second, they avoided prolonged involvement by pursuing modest, programme-level adjustments. Third, they circumvented the restrictions on scope and focus by creating new venues outside of the policy subsystem. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice | - |
dc.subject | agenda setting | - |
dc.subject | comparative policy analysis | - |
dc.subject | mixed methods | - |
dc.subject | policy advocacy | - |
dc.subject | transitioning regimes | - |
dc.title | Policy Advocacy in Transitioning Regimes: Comparative Lessons from the Case of Harbour Protection in Hong Kong | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, WF: dwflam@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, KN: kwachan@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, WF=rp00570 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chan, KN=rp02084 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13876988.2015.1095427 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84945302942 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 257519 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1572-5448 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000399351600004 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1387-6988 | - |