File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1136/emj.2006.039701
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33846199568
- PMID: 17183041
- WOS: WOS:000243494900011
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Patients' perceptions of nasopharyngeal aspiration in the emergency department of a teaching hospital in Hong Kong
Title | Patients' perceptions of nasopharyngeal aspiration in the emergency department of a teaching hospital in Hong Kong |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Citation | Emergency Medicine Journal, 2007, v. 24, n. 1, p. 35-36 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Nasopharyngeal aspiration (NPA) is the preferred method for collecting specimens for viral culture in patients with respiratory tract infection. As virus identification may influence admission and treatment decisions, it is important to perform NPA in the emergency department. The test may be uncomfortable and poorly tolerated. This prospective study investigated patients' perceptions of NPA. Patients in the emergency department with upper respiratory tract infection undergoing NPA between 9 March 2005 and 12 August 2005 were included. 86 patients (mean (SD) age 47 (23) years; 49 women) were recruited. 22 (26%) patients complained that NPA was very uncomfortable, 59 (69%) reported that it was mildly uncomfortable and 5 (6%) patients reported no discomfoct. On a 10-point scale, the median discomfort score was 4.29 (34%) patients stated that NPA was more uncomfortable than blood taking, 19 (22%) patients felt that both were similar and 38 (44%) patients felt that NPA was less uncomfortable (p value not significant). NPA performed in the emergency department is well tolerated and should be considered in emergency departments when results may influence patient management. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/240715 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.956 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wai, AKC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwok, WO | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, MS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Graham, CA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rainer, TH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-12T01:46:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-12T01:46:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Emergency Medicine Journal, 2007, v. 24, n. 1, p. 35-36 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-0205 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/240715 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Nasopharyngeal aspiration (NPA) is the preferred method for collecting specimens for viral culture in patients with respiratory tract infection. As virus identification may influence admission and treatment decisions, it is important to perform NPA in the emergency department. The test may be uncomfortable and poorly tolerated. This prospective study investigated patients' perceptions of NPA. Patients in the emergency department with upper respiratory tract infection undergoing NPA between 9 March 2005 and 12 August 2005 were included. 86 patients (mean (SD) age 47 (23) years; 49 women) were recruited. 22 (26%) patients complained that NPA was very uncomfortable, 59 (69%) reported that it was mildly uncomfortable and 5 (6%) patients reported no discomfoct. On a 10-point scale, the median discomfort score was 4.29 (34%) patients stated that NPA was more uncomfortable than blood taking, 19 (22%) patients felt that both were similar and 38 (44%) patients felt that NPA was less uncomfortable (p value not significant). NPA performed in the emergency department is well tolerated and should be considered in emergency departments when results may influence patient management. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Emergency Medicine Journal | - |
dc.title | Patients' perceptions of nasopharyngeal aspiration in the emergency department of a teaching hospital in Hong Kong | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/emj.2006.039701 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17183041 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC2658151 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33846199568 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 24 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 35 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 36 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000243494900011 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1472-0205 | - |