File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effectiveness of a small cash incentive on abstinence and use of cessation aids for adult smokers: A randomized controlled trial

TitleEffectiveness of a small cash incentive on abstinence and use of cessation aids for adult smokers: A randomized controlled trial
Authors
KeywordsHealth services
Cessation
Addiction
Incentive
Issue Date2017
Citation
Addictive Behaviors, 2017, v. 66, p. 17-25 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2016 Elsevier LtdBackground Large amount of financial incentive was effective to increase tobacco abstinence, but the effect of small amount is unknown. Purpose We evaluated if a small amount of cash incentive (HK$500/US$64) increased abstinence, quit attempt, and use of cessation aids. Methods A three-armed, block randomized controlled trial recruited 1143 adult daily smokers who participated in the Hong Kong “Quit to Win” Contest. Biochemically validated quitters of the early-informed (n = 379, notified about the incentive at 1-week and 1-month follow-up) and the late-informed incentive group (n = 385, notified at 3-month follow-up) received the incentive at 3 months. The validated quitters of the control group (n = 379) received the incentive at 6 months without prior notification. All subjects received brief advice, a self-help education card and a 12-page booklet. The outcomes were self-reported 7-day point prevalence of abstinence, quit attempt (intentional abstinence for at least 24 h) and use of cessation aids at 3-month follow-up. Results By intention-to-treat, the early-informed group at 3-month follow-up reported a higher rate of quit attempt (no smoking for at least 24 h) than the other 2 groups (44.1% vs. 37.4%, Odds ratio (OR) = 1.32, 95% CI 1.03–1.69, p = 0.03), but they had similar abstinence (9.2% vs. 9.7%, OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.62, 1.45). The early- and late-informed group showed similar quitting outcomes. The early-informed group reported more quit attempts by reading self-help materials than the other 2 groups (31.4% vs. 25.3%, OR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.12–2.18, p < 0.01). Conclusions The small cash incentive with early notification increased quit attempt by “self-directed help” but not abstinence. Future financial incentive-based programmes with a larger incentive, accessible quitting resources and encouragement of using existing smoking cessation services are needed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/240757
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.561
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Yee Tak Derek-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Man Ping-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Ho Cheung William-
dc.contributor.authorKwong, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Vienna-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Sophia Siu Chee-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Tai hing-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-12T01:46:46Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-12T01:46:46Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAddictive Behaviors, 2017, v. 66, p. 17-25-
dc.identifier.issn0306-4603-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/240757-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Elsevier LtdBackground Large amount of financial incentive was effective to increase tobacco abstinence, but the effect of small amount is unknown. Purpose We evaluated if a small amount of cash incentive (HK$500/US$64) increased abstinence, quit attempt, and use of cessation aids. Methods A three-armed, block randomized controlled trial recruited 1143 adult daily smokers who participated in the Hong Kong “Quit to Win” Contest. Biochemically validated quitters of the early-informed (n = 379, notified about the incentive at 1-week and 1-month follow-up) and the late-informed incentive group (n = 385, notified at 3-month follow-up) received the incentive at 3 months. The validated quitters of the control group (n = 379) received the incentive at 6 months without prior notification. All subjects received brief advice, a self-help education card and a 12-page booklet. The outcomes were self-reported 7-day point prevalence of abstinence, quit attempt (intentional abstinence for at least 24 h) and use of cessation aids at 3-month follow-up. Results By intention-to-treat, the early-informed group at 3-month follow-up reported a higher rate of quit attempt (no smoking for at least 24 h) than the other 2 groups (44.1% vs. 37.4%, Odds ratio (OR) = 1.32, 95% CI 1.03–1.69, p = 0.03), but they had similar abstinence (9.2% vs. 9.7%, OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.62, 1.45). The early- and late-informed group showed similar quitting outcomes. The early-informed group reported more quit attempts by reading self-help materials than the other 2 groups (31.4% vs. 25.3%, OR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.12–2.18, p < 0.01). Conclusions The small cash incentive with early notification increased quit attempt by “self-directed help” but not abstinence. Future financial incentive-based programmes with a larger incentive, accessible quitting resources and encouragement of using existing smoking cessation services are needed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAddictive Behaviors-
dc.subjectHealth services-
dc.subjectCessation-
dc.subjectAddiction-
dc.subjectIncentive-
dc.titleEffectiveness of a small cash incentive on abstinence and use of cessation aids for adult smokers: A randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.11.006-
dc.identifier.pmid27863323-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84995593524-
dc.identifier.hkuros270716-
dc.identifier.volume66-
dc.identifier.spage17-
dc.identifier.epage25-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6327-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000392684300004-
dc.identifier.issnl0306-4603-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats